Suppr超能文献

用于比较各组镇痛药剂量的统计学检验分析。

Analysis of statistical tests to compare doses of analgesics among groups.

作者信息

Dexter F

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1994 Sep;81(3):610-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199409000-00013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A common type of anesthesiologic study determines the effect of an intervention on the doses of analgesics given to groups of patients. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of several appropriate statistical tests to examine the results of such studies.

METHODS

Total doses of morphine received in a postanesthesia care unit were recorded for patients undergoing vitrectomy (244), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (104), or abdominal hysterectomy (143). Multiple simulated samples were then drawn from these data. These simulated samples were used in computer simulations of clinical trials comparing doses among groups. Assessments were made of the relative performance of the t test; analysis of variance; randomization; and the Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-square tests for comparing doses of analgesics given to two or three groups of patients.

RESULTS

The distributions were not normal. No statistical test incorrectly suggested that a difference existed among groups when there was no difference. A randomization test to compare two groups' means overestimated actual P values. A chi-square test, which compared fractions of patients in each group who received no morphine, had approximately the same power as the t or analysis of variance tests to detect differences among groups. Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis tests, for differences between two or more than two groups' medians, respectively, had the greatest power to detect difference(s) among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis are the best tests to find differences among doses of analgesics given to groups of patients.

摘要

背景

一种常见的麻醉学研究类型是确定一种干预措施对给予患者组的镇痛药剂量的影响。本研究的目的是评估几种合适的统计检验方法在检验此类研究结果时的有效性。

方法

记录了接受玻璃体切除术(244例)、腹腔镜胆囊切除术(104例)或腹部子宫切除术(143例)的患者在麻醉后护理单元接受的吗啡总剂量。然后从这些数据中抽取多个模拟样本。这些模拟样本用于比较组间剂量的临床试验计算机模拟。对t检验、方差分析、随机化以及用于比较给予两组或三组患者的镇痛药剂量的曼-惠特尼检验、克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验和卡方检验的相对性能进行了评估。

结果

分布不正常。当不存在差异时,没有统计检验错误地表明组间存在差异。比较两组均值的随机化检验高估了实际P值。比较每组中未接受吗啡的患者比例的卡方检验,在检测组间差异方面与t检验或方差分析检验具有大致相同的效能。分别用于比较两组或两组以上中位数差异的曼-惠特尼检验或克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验,在检测组间差异方面具有最大的效能。

结论

曼-惠特尼检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验是发现给予患者组的镇痛药剂量差异的最佳检验方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验