Ben-Nun A, Yossefi S, Lehmann D
Dept. of Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Eur J Immunol. 1993 Mar;23(3):689-96. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830230318.
Bordetella pertussis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, routinely used to promote the development of autoimmune disease, were recently reported to also be effective in inducing protection against an autoimmune disease. Thus, we previously demonstrated that SJL/J and (SJL/J x BALB/c)F1 mice that are genetically susceptible to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) become highly refractory to the induction of the disease following their exposure to B. pertussis and M. tuberculosis. In the present study, the pertussis toxin (PT) from B. pertussis and the purified protein derivative (PPD) of M. tuberculosis, were found to be sufficient to fully protect against EAE and thus may be the major bacterial components responsible for conferring protection. The 65-kDa heat-shock protein played only a marginal role in the protection against EAE induced by these bacteria. Both PT and PPD were protective when given before, but not after, the encephalitogenic challenge, and minute amounts (5-50 ng) emulsified in oil were sufficient to confer long-lasting resistance to EAE. The effect of PT or PPD on EAE differed from that of mitogens or bacterial superantigens, suggesting that their protection ability was not attributable merely to mitogenic or superantigenic properties. The mechanism of protection is not yet clear. Preliminary studies revealed a complex mechanism of protection whereby PPD and PT may operate differently. Thus, only PPD-induced, but not PT-induced, protection was transferrable by CD4+ T lymphocytes bearing an alpha beta T cell antigen receptor. Neither PT nor PPD had a protective effect on EAE mediated by preformed pathogenic T lymphocytes and it is most likely that they exert their protection by affecting the development of such T lymphocytes. How bacteria such as B. pertussis and M. tuberculosis can either enhance the development of an autoimmune disease or protect against the disease is not yet clear. However, identifying PT and PPD as the bacterial components active in protection may allow a better understanding of the modulatory effects of bacteria and point to the potential use of such bacterial products in immunomodulation of autoimmune diseases.
百日咳博德特氏菌和结核分枝杆菌通常用于促进自身免疫性疾病的发展,但最近有报道称它们在诱导针对自身免疫性疾病的保护方面也有效。因此,我们之前证明,对实验性自身免疫性脑脊髓炎(EAE)具有遗传易感性的SJL/J和(SJL/J×BALB/c)F1小鼠在接触百日咳博德特氏菌和结核分枝杆菌后对该疾病的诱导变得高度耐受。在本研究中,发现百日咳博德特氏菌的百日咳毒素(PT)和结核分枝杆菌的纯化蛋白衍生物(PPD)足以完全预防EAE,因此可能是赋予保护作用的主要细菌成分。65 kDa热休克蛋白在抵抗这些细菌诱导的EAE方面仅起边缘作用。PT和PPD在致脑炎攻击之前给予时具有保护作用,但在攻击之后则没有,并且以油乳化的微量(5 - 50 ng)就足以赋予对EAE的持久抵抗力。PT或PPD对EAE的作用不同于有丝分裂原或细菌超抗原,这表明它们的保护能力不仅仅归因于有丝分裂或超抗原特性。保护机制尚不清楚。初步研究揭示了一种复杂的保护机制,据此PPD和PT的作用方式可能不同。因此,只有PPD诱导的而非PT诱导的保护可由携带αβT细胞抗原受体的CD4 + T淋巴细胞传递。PT和PPD对预先形成的致病性T淋巴细胞介导的EAE均无保护作用,并且它们很可能通过影响此类T淋巴细胞的发育来发挥保护作用。百日咳博德特氏菌和结核分枝杆菌等细菌如何既能促进自身免疫性疾病的发展又能预防该疾病尚不清楚。然而,将PT和PPD鉴定为具有保护活性的细菌成分可能有助于更好地理解细菌的调节作用,并指出此类细菌产物在自身免疫性疾病免疫调节中的潜在用途。