Caro J J, Groome P A, Flegel K M
Division of General Internal Medicine, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Lancet. 1993 May 29;341(8857):1381-4. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90950-l.
Randomised trials confirm that anticoagulants reduce the risk of emboli in atrial fibrillation. To apply this evidence to practice, we developed an expression relating all relevant factors. Trial-based estimates of the risks of emboli and haemorrhage, and of the effects of anticoagulants on these risks were used to derive the extent to which haemorrhage has to be seen to be more detrimental than emboli to justify not using anticoagulants. Information from other studies was used to assess the risks for the types of patients not included in the trials. Haemorrhage needs to be assessed as being at least six times more detrimental than emboli to warrant withholding anticoagulants from patients like those in the trials. Only in patients with lone atrial fibrillation and in those with features suggesting a bleeding risk six times higher than the trials' average would a perception of equal detriment risk justify not giving anticoagulation.
随机试验证实,抗凝剂可降低心房颤动患者发生栓塞的风险。为了将这一证据应用于实际,我们得出了一个涉及所有相关因素的表达式。基于试验对栓塞和出血风险以及抗凝剂对这些风险的影响的估计,来推导出血相对于栓塞必须达到何种程度的更有害性,才能证明不使用抗凝剂是合理的。来自其他研究的信息用于评估试验未纳入的患者类型的风险。对于试验中的患者,出血的有害性至少需被评估为栓塞的六倍以上,才能保证不给予抗凝剂。只有在孤立性心房颤动患者以及那些具有提示出血风险比试验平均水平高六倍特征的患者中,认为有害风险相等才足以证明不给于抗凝治疗是合理的。