Suppr超能文献

艰难梭菌分离株分型方法的比较

Comparison of typing methods for Clostridium difficile isolates.

作者信息

Wolfhagen M J, Fluit A C, Torensma R, Jansze M, Kuypers A F, Verhage E A, Verhoef J

机构信息

Eijkman-Winkler Institute for Medical and Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Aug;31(8):2208-11. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.2208-2211.1993.

Abstract

A simple discriminative typing method for Clostridium difficile has been developed. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of whole-cell proteins and restriction enzyme analysis are relatively simple techniques but are difficult to evaluate, especially the restriction enzyme analysis. Immunoblotting and restriction fragment length polymorphism typing facilitate simple discrimination of patterns.

摘要

已开发出一种用于艰难梭菌的简单鉴别分型方法。全细胞蛋白的十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳和限制性内切酶分析是相对简单的技术,但难以评估,尤其是限制性内切酶分析。免疫印迹和限制性片段长度多态性分型有助于简单地区分不同模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21ca/265725/514c41f6adad/jcm00020-0261-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验