Kehr J
CMA/Microdialysis AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Neurosci Methods. 1993 Jul;48(3):251-61. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(93)90096-a.
The existing methods of quantitative microdialysis are reviewed. The methods are divided into 8 groups, depending on the mathematical models and theoretical principles used to describe convective diffusion in the extracellular space of the brain. Special emphasis is made to describe each method from a historical perspective, showing its main contribution to recent knowledge, as well as its limitations and drawbacks. It is concluded that those methods based on explicitly derived equations for in vivo recovery are still too approximative and not suitable for routine application. Therefore, empirical models based on varying perfusion flow rates or concentrations of substances in the perfusion solution, found several practical implications. Methods using a reference substance as a marker of in vivo recovery are also discussed. The paper stresses the increasing importance of methods allowing the quantitative evaluation of microdialysis data whenever measuring neurotransmitter release, drug concentrations or pharmacokinetic variables.
本文综述了现有的定量微透析方法。根据用于描述脑细胞外空间对流扩散的数学模型和理论原理,这些方法分为8组。特别强调从历史角度描述每种方法,展示其对最新知识的主要贡献,以及其局限性和缺点。得出的结论是,那些基于体内回收率显式推导方程的方法仍然过于近似,不适合常规应用。因此,基于改变灌注流速或灌注液中物质浓度的经验模型具有一些实际意义。还讨论了使用参考物质作为体内回收率标志物的方法。本文强调了在测量神经递质释放、药物浓度或药代动力学变量时,能够对微透析数据进行定量评估的方法的重要性日益增加。