Schindler J J, Warren R P, Allen S D, Jackson M K
Department of Animal, Dairy and Veterinary Science, Utah State University, Logan 84322-5600.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Dec;37(12):2716-21. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.12.2716.
The immunological effects of amphotericin B and liposomal amphotericin B were studied in vitro by measuring B- and T-lymphocyte proliferation on splenocytes from immune-normal, cyclosporine-compromised, and cyclophosphamide-compromised mice. Cellular viability of cells from immune-normal mice was also evaluated. The concentrations used (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 micrograms/ml) encompassed clinically relevant doses. Amphotericin B consistently reduced the abilities of B cells and T cells to proliferate, especially when administered at higher than clinically relevant doses. Direct cytotoxicity probably played only a minor role, since viability studies showed that, compared with its liposomal analog, amphotericin B reduced the number of viable cells by no more than 10%. Clinically relevant doses of liposomal amphotericin B (A. S. Janoff, L. T. Boni, M. C. Popescu, S. R. Minchey, P. R. Cullis, T. D. Madden, T. Tarashi, S. M. Gruner, E. Shyamsunder, M. W. Tate, R. Mendelsohn, and D. Bonner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:6122-6126, 1988; R. Mehta, G. Lopez-Berestein, R. Hopfer, K. Mills, and R. L. Juliano, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 770:230-234, 1984) did not inhibit any of the immune parameters examined. Liposomes may, therefore, be a useful means of delivering more drug to a host infected with a fungal organism without further compromising the patient's already suppressed immune system.
通过检测免疫正常、环孢素免疫受损和环磷酰胺免疫受损小鼠脾细胞中B淋巴细胞和T淋巴细胞的增殖情况,在体外研究了两性霉素B和脂质体两性霉素B的免疫效应。还评估了免疫正常小鼠细胞的细胞活力。所使用的浓度(0、0.5、1、2、4、8和16微克/毫升)涵盖了临床相关剂量。两性霉素B持续降低B细胞和T细胞的增殖能力,尤其是在高于临床相关剂量给药时。直接细胞毒性可能仅起次要作用,因为活力研究表明,与脂质体类似物相比,两性霉素B使活细胞数量减少不超过10%。临床相关剂量的脂质体两性霉素B(A.S.贾诺夫、L.T.博尼、M.C.波佩斯库、S.R.明切伊、P.R.卡利斯、T.D.马登、T.塔拉希、S.M.格鲁纳、E.夏姆桑德、M.W.泰特、R.门德尔松和D.邦纳,《美国国家科学院院刊》85:6122 - 6126,1988;R.梅塔、G.洛佩斯 - 贝雷斯坦、R.霍普费尔、K.米尔斯和R.L.朱利亚诺,《生物化学与生物物理学报》770:230 - 234,1984)并未抑制所检测的任何免疫参数。因此,脂质体可能是一种有用的手段,可将更多药物递送至感染真菌的宿主,而不会进一步损害患者已经受到抑制的免疫系统。