• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反思科学思维:儿童对假设-证据关系的理解。

Reflecting on scientific thinking: children's understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relation.

作者信息

Ruffman T, Perner J, Olson D R, Doherty M

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Sussex at Brighton, Falmer, UK.

出版信息

Child Dev. 1993 Dec;64(6):1617-36.

PMID:8112110
Abstract

3 experiments were carried out to examine children's understanding of the role of covariation evidence in hypothesis formation. Previous research suggested that it is not until 8 to 11 years of age that children begin to understand how a given pattern of covariation supports a particular hypothesis about which factor is causally responsible for an observed effect. Experiments 1 to 3 employed a different (fake evidence) technique than previous research and showed that by 6 years of age most children understand how evidence would lead a story character to form a different hypothesis than the subject's own. Experiment 3 showed that most 6- and young 7-year-olds understand how a character's future actions (e.g., choice of an object) and predictions of future outcomes depend on the hypothesis he or she holds.

摘要

进行了3项实验,以检验儿童对协变证据在假设形成中所起作用的理解。先前的研究表明,直到8至11岁,儿童才开始理解给定的协变模式如何支持关于哪个因素对观察到的效应负有因果责任的特定假设。实验1至3采用了与先前研究不同的(虚假证据)技术,结果表明,到6岁时,大多数儿童都理解证据如何使故事中的角色形成与受试者自己不同的假设。实验3表明,大多数6岁和7岁的儿童都理解一个角色的未来行动(例如,选择一个物体)以及对未来结果的预测如何取决于他或她所持有的假设。

相似文献

1
Reflecting on scientific thinking: children's understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relation.反思科学思维:儿童对假设-证据关系的理解。
Child Dev. 1993 Dec;64(6):1617-36.
2
Enabling conditions and children's understanding of pretense.促成条件与儿童对假装的理解。
Cognition. 2009 Nov;113(2):177-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Sep 5.
3
Across the great divide: bridging the gap between understanding of toddlers' and older children's thinking.跨越巨大差异:弥合对幼儿与大龄儿童思维理解之间的差距
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2000;65(2):i-vii, 1-96.
4
Cross-cultural investigations.跨文化调查。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1996;61(1-2):131-55.
5
How fantasy benefits young children's understanding of pretense.幻想如何有益于幼儿对假装的理解。
Dev Sci. 2006 Jan;9(1):63-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00464.x.
6
Young children's understanding of thought bubbles and of thoughts.幼儿对思想泡泡和思想的理解。
Child Dev. 1996 Jun;67(3):768-88.
7
Young children's understanding of multiple object identity: appearance, pretense and function.幼儿对多个物体同一性的理解:外观、假装和功能。
Dev Sci. 2006 Nov;9(6):590-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00537.x.
8
Children's thinking about their own and others' regret and relief.儿童对自己和他人的后悔和宽慰的思考。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Jun-Jul;106(2-3):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.02.005. Epub 2010 Mar 21.
9
Children's developing conceptions of the mind and brain.儿童对心智和大脑的发展概念。
Child Dev. 1982 Feb;53(1):222-34.
10
Components of young children's trait understanding: behavior-to-trait inferences and trait-to-behavior predictions.幼儿特质理解的组成部分:从行为到特质的推断以及从特质到行为的预测。
Child Dev. 2007 Sep-Oct;78(5):1543-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01082.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Bringing together multimodal and multilevel approaches to study the emergence of social bonds between children and improve social AI.结合多模态和多层次方法来研究儿童之间社会纽带的形成,并改进社交人工智能。
Front Neuroergon. 2024 May 17;5:1290256. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2024.1290256. eCollection 2024.
2
Editorial: The Emergence and Development of Scientific Thinking During the Early Years: Basic Processes and Supportive Contexts.社论:早期科学思维的出现与发展:基本过程与支持环境
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 19;12:629384. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.629384. eCollection 2021.
3
Preschoolers' Induction of the Concept of Material Kind to Make Predictions: The Effects of Comparison and Linguistic Labels.
学龄前儿童对物质种类概念的归纳以进行预测:比较和语言标签的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 19;11:531503. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531503. eCollection 2020.
4
Of Blickets, Butterflies, and Baby Dinosaurs: Children's Diagnostic Reasoning Across Domains.小积木、蝴蝶与恐龙宝宝:儿童跨领域的诊断推理
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 25;11:2210. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02210. eCollection 2020.
5
The Impact of a Construction Play on 5- to 6-Year-Old Children's Reasoning About Stability.建构游戏对5至6岁儿童稳定性推理能力的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 14;11:1737. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01737. eCollection 2020.
6
Changing minds: Children's inferences about third party belief revision.改变观念:儿童对第三方信念修正的推理
Dev Sci. 2018 Mar;21(2). doi: 10.1111/desc.12553. Epub 2017 May 12.
7
Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators: Efforts to Improve Math and Science Learning Opportunities in Early Childhood Classrooms.幼儿教育工作者的专业发展:改善幼儿课堂数学和科学学习机会的努力。
J Educ Psychol. 2015 May;107(2):407-422. doi: 10.1037/a0037621.
8
Controlling the message: preschoolers' use of information to teach and deceive others.操控信息:学龄前儿童利用信息教导和欺骗他人的行为
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 23;6:867. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00867. eCollection 2015.
9
The development of diagnostic reasoning about uncertain events between ages 4-7.4至7岁儿童对不确定事件的诊断推理发展
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 20;9(3):e92285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092285. eCollection 2014.
10
The development of children's ability to use evidence to infer reality status.儿童运用证据推断现实状况能力的发展。
Child Dev. 2009 Jan-Feb;80(1):101-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01248.x.