Bird M, Luszcz M
La Trobe University.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1993 Nov;15(6):921-32. doi: 10.1080/01688639308402608.
Twenty-seven probable Alzheimer's disease (SDAT) subjects studied pictures using either alphabetical or category cues at acquisition and retrieval, to determine whether remembering (a) can only be enhanced when cues at acquisition and retrieval match (encoding specificity); and, (b) is sensitive to levels of processing. Encoding specificity was superior to 'mixed' cues at acquisition and retrieval but both were superior to free recall. A levels of processing effect in the encoding specificity conditions appeared due to the superiority of category over alphabetical cues, a superiority also reflected in the 'mixed' condition that incorporated category recall cues. Alphabetical cues helped only if acquisition had been alphabetical; they interfered with recall of categorically encoded items. Discussion highlighted (a) the sensitivity to, necessity for, and nature of, assistance at both acquisition and retrieval; and (b) the possibility that SDAT subjects may engage in more spontaneous processing, using the semantic network, than hitherto thought.
27名可能患有阿尔茨海默病(SDAT)的受试者在图片获取和回忆时使用字母或类别线索,以确定记忆(a)是否仅在获取和回忆线索匹配时(编码特异性)才能增强;以及(b)是否对加工水平敏感。编码特异性在获取和回忆时优于“混合”线索,但两者都优于自由回忆。在编码特异性条件下出现的加工水平效应似乎是由于类别线索优于字母线索,这种优势也反映在包含类别回忆线索的“混合”条件中。只有在获取时使用字母线索,字母线索才会有帮助;它们会干扰对按类别编码项目的回忆。讨论强调了(a)获取和回忆时对辅助的敏感性、必要性和性质;以及(b)SDAT受试者可能比迄今认为的更多地利用语义网络进行自发加工的可能性。