Neviere R, Mathieu D, Riou Y, Guimez P, Renaud N, Chagnon J L, Wattel F
Service d'Urgence Respiratoire et de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Calmette, Lille, France.
Crit Care Med. 1994 Jan;22(1):81-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199401000-00017.
To compare measurement of cardiac output by the CO2 rebreathing method vs. the thermodilution cardiac output technique in the setting of acute respiratory failure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Prospective, comparative study of two methods in a consecutive sample.
Intensive care unit.
Twenty-five patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute respiratory failure were studied. The patients were being mechanically ventilated and monitored with systemic and pulmonary artery catheters.
Cardiac output was determined, using both the thermodilution technique and an indirect CO2 Fick method. Veno-arterial CO2 content difference was calculated from an estimated mixed venous PCO2 obtained by an equilibrium CO2 rebreathing method and measured PaCO2. PCO2 was converted to content using the equation of the CO2 dissociation curve described by McHardy. A wide range of cardiac output was studied. There was a significant correlation between thermodilution and CO2 rebreathing methods (r2 = .92, p < .001). The mean difference between thermodilution and CO2 rebreathing methods was -0.06 L/min/m2, standard deviation for the bias was 0.028 L/min/m2, and 95% confidence interval for the bias was -0.120 to -0.001 L/min/m2.
Our results suggest that the CO2 rebreathing method may be a reliable non-invasive technique to determine cardiac output in mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
比较慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性呼吸衰竭患者中,采用二氧化碳重呼吸法与热稀释法测量心输出量的差异。
对连续样本中的两种方法进行前瞻性比较研究。
重症监护病房。
研究了25例患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病并伴有急性呼吸衰竭的患者。这些患者正在接受机械通气,并通过体循环和肺动脉导管进行监测。
分别采用热稀释法和间接二氧化碳菲克法测定心输出量。通过平衡二氧化碳重呼吸法获得的估计混合静脉血二氧化碳分压(PCO2)和测量得到的动脉血二氧化碳分压计算动静脉二氧化碳含量差。使用McHardy描述的二氧化碳解离曲线方程将二氧化碳分压转换为含量。研究了广泛的心输出量范围。热稀释法和二氧化碳重呼吸法之间存在显著相关性(r2 = 0.92,p < 0.001)。热稀释法与二氧化碳重呼吸法之间的平均差异为-0.06 L/min/m2,偏差的标准差为0.028 L/min/m2,偏差的95%置信区间为-0.120至-0.001 L/min/m2。
我们的结果表明,二氧化碳重呼吸法可能是一种可靠的非侵入性技术,用于测定接受机械通气的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的心输出量。