Thromb Haemost. 1993 Nov 15;70(5):781-6.
A multicenter study involving 13 laboratories was designed to compare a common procedure for screening lupus anticoagulants (LA) to the different practices currently in use in these laboratories. The common procedure combined 3 phospholipid-dependent assays, including mixing studies and a phospholipid neutralizing test. Due to the heterogeneity of LA expression, an abnormal result in at least one of the tests was sufficient to classify a sample as positive for LA. Consecutive samples referred for LA diagnosis were evaluated in parallel by each participant and the data found using the common procedure were analyzed independently according to mutually agreed cut-offs and criteria for sample classification. Within a period of 3 months, 535 samples were included, of which 147 were judged LA positive, 29 undetermined and 359 negative by the respective laboratories using their current practice. When using the common procedure, 149 plasmas were said to be positive, 38 undetermined and 348 negative. Absolute concordance occurred for 81% of the specimen population and absolute discordance (positive versus negative) for 7%. The level of agreement between the common procedure and the current practices, assessed by kappa indexes, indicated noticeable variations in the rates of detection from laboratory to laboratory. Among the different tests used in the common procedure, regular APTT was the least sensitive (about 50% detection) but none of the other tests alone recognized more than 73% of specimens from the LA positive population. This yield increased to about 90% with any combination of 2 sensitive tests.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
一项涉及13个实验室的多中心研究旨在比较狼疮抗凝物(LA)筛查的常用程序与这些实验室目前使用的不同方法。常用程序结合了3种依赖磷脂的检测方法,包括混合试验和磷脂中和试验。由于LA表达的异质性,至少一项检测结果异常就足以将样本分类为LA阳性。每个参与者对连续送检LA诊断的样本进行平行评估,并根据共同商定的样本分类临界值和标准独立分析使用常用程序获得的数据。在3个月的时间内,共纳入535个样本,各实验室根据其当前方法判断其中147个为LA阳性,29个为未确定,359个为阴性。使用常用程序时,149份血浆被判定为阳性,38份未确定,348份阴性。81%的样本完全一致,7%完全不一致(阳性与阴性)。通过kappa指数评估,常用程序与当前方法之间的一致性水平表明各实验室的检测率存在显著差异。在常用程序中使用的不同检测方法中,常规活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)最不敏感(检测率约为50%),但其他任何一项检测单独识别出的LA阳性样本均不超过73%。两种敏感检测方法联合使用时,检出率可提高至约90%。(摘要截选于250字)