Curtis M J, Jinnah R H, Wilson V, Cunningham B W
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Injury. 1994 Mar;25(2):99-104. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(94)90111-2.
This study assesses the rigidity and strength of fixation provided by intramedullary and extramedullary devices for proximal femoral fractures. Stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures were studied in paired femora after internal fixation with the Gamma nail and Richards 135 degrees classic hip-screw implants; in subtrochanteric fractures, the 95 degrees Richards condylar screw was studied in addition. Subsidence of the sliding screw within the plate and nail constructs was measured. Fixation of subtrochanteric fractures with the intramedullary Gamma nail was significantly stronger and more rigid than that with the extramedullary screw plate devices. Under conditions of simulated protected weight bearing, the 95 degrees condylar screw plate provided more rigid fixation than did the 135 degrees hip screw. There was no significant difference in the strength of fixation of stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures between the Gamma nail and the hip screw, although the Gamma nail provided more rigid fixation.
本研究评估了用于股骨近端骨折的髓内和髓外固定装置所提供的固定强度和刚度。在使用Gamma钉和Richards 135度经典髋螺钉植入物进行内固定后,对成对股骨中的稳定和不稳定转子间骨折进行了研究;对于转子下骨折,还研究了95度的Richards髁螺钉。测量了钢板和髓内钉结构中滑动螺钉的下沉情况。与髓外螺钉钢板装置相比,使用髓内Gamma钉固定转子下骨折的强度和刚度明显更高。在模拟保护性负重条件下,95度髁螺钉钢板提供的固定刚度比135度髋螺钉更高。尽管Gamma钉提供了更坚固的固定,但Gamma钉和髋螺钉在稳定和不稳定转子间骨折固定强度方面没有显著差异。