Schacht E
E. Tosse & Co. GmbH, Hamburg.
Z Rheumatol. 1993 Nov-Dec;52(6):365-82.
The triad of inflammation, immunoproliferation and synovial hyperplasia is recognized in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis, however, the sequence of events remains as highly controversial as ever. The "RA pyramid" was established on the assumption that inflammation is at the top with the destructive processes as sequelae. The moderate successes achieved by conservative therapy with regard to long-term outcome cast doubt on this hypothesis. Inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis have not been and are not disease modifying. Do substances which influence the endothelial adhesion molecules or leucocyte adhesion receptors (leumedines) promise to be more successful? Do the empirically developed disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (Gold parenteral, MTX) have to be administered earlier? Unfortunately, there is a need for a differential diagnosis which is prognostically valid with regard to the dynamics and aggressiveness of rheumatoid arthritis. Moreover, a pharmacological basis for optimally founded combination strategies is also lacking. Presently, the emphasis of research is directed at the regulation of dysfunctional immune systems. Immunosuppressives (cyclosporin A), cytokine antagonists, receptor antagonists and soluble cytokine receptors (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-alpha), antibodies against lymphocyte subgroups (CD4, CD7) or against cytokines and their receptors are part of the arsenal for the medium term. Too little is still known about the role of protective cytokines (TGF-beta, IL-4, gamma-INF). Currently, however, it is prognosticated that these targeted therapies will only succeed in RA subgroups or only in intelligent combinations. More attractive alternative are strategic therapy modalities which intervene very early in the pathological process, such as the modulation of antigen presentation (MHC blocking peptides, T-cell receptor antagonists, T-cell vaccination) or the induction of tolerance against autoantigens through the oral administration of antigens (collagen II, HSP's, OM-8980). If the center of the pathological process, however, is found in the synovial proliferation of tumor-like cell clusters, then there are only a few years at the beginning of the disease when there is a real chance to impede destruction. In this case, aggressive induction therapy can be the only key to success. In the future, specifically active cytostatics (inhibitors of angiogenesis) will have to be developed and clinical trials conducted on adjuvant therapies with substances which strengthen bone and cartilage, making them more resistant to aggressive cell clusters (bisphosphonates, calcitonins, metalloproteinase- or collagenase-inhibitors).
炎症、免疫增殖和滑膜增生三联征在类风湿关节炎的发病机制中已得到公认,然而,事件发生的先后顺序依旧极具争议。“类风湿关节炎金字塔”是基于炎症处于顶端而破坏性过程为后遗症这一假设建立的。保守治疗在长期疗效方面取得的适度成功对此假设提出了质疑。前列腺素合成抑制剂过去未曾、现在也未改变疾病进程。影响内皮黏附分子或白细胞黏附受体(白细胞介素)的物质会更有效吗?凭经验研发的改善病情抗风湿药(胃肠外金制剂、甲氨蝶呤)必须更早给药吗?遗憾的是,对于类风湿关节炎的动态变化和侵袭性,需要一种具有预后价值的鉴别诊断方法。此外,也缺乏基于最佳依据的联合治疗策略的药理学基础。目前,研究重点在于调节功能失调的免疫系统。免疫抑制剂(环孢素A)、细胞因子拮抗剂、受体拮抗剂和可溶性细胞因子受体(白细胞介素-1、白细胞介素-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α)、针对淋巴细胞亚群(CD4、CD7)或细胞因子及其受体的抗体是中期治疗手段的一部分。对于保护性细胞因子(转化生长因子-β、白细胞介素-4、γ-干扰素)的作用仍知之甚少。然而,目前预计这些靶向治疗仅在类风湿关节炎亚组中或仅在合理联合应用时才会成功。更具吸引力的替代方法是在病理过程早期就进行干预的策略性治疗模式,例如调节抗原呈递(主要组织相容性复合体阻断肽、T细胞受体拮抗剂、T细胞疫苗接种)或通过口服抗原(Ⅱ型胶原、热休克蛋白、OM-8980)诱导对自身抗原的耐受性。然而,如果病理过程的核心在于肿瘤样细胞簇的滑膜增生,那么在疾病初期只有几年时间有真正机会阻止破坏。在这种情况下,积极的诱导治疗可能是成功的唯一关键。未来,必须研发出具有特异性活性的细胞毒性药物(血管生成抑制剂),并开展使用增强骨骼和软骨使其更能抵抗侵袭性细胞簇的物质(双膦酸盐、降钙素、金属蛋白酶或胶原酶抑制剂)进行辅助治疗的临床试验。