• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症疼痛评估:一项持续的挑战。

Assessment of cancer pain: a continuous challenge.

作者信息

Grossman S A

机构信息

Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD 21287.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 1994 Mar;2(2):105-10. doi: 10.1007/BF00572091.

DOI:10.1007/BF00572091
PMID:8156263
Abstract

A comprehensive assessment of cancer pain is the first and perhaps most important step toward pain relief. Yet, this assessment is frequently neglected in patients with cancer pain. This paper addresses five important aspects of cancer pain assessment: (1) What constitutes cancer pain assessment? (2) Why is it important? (3) Why is it frequently overlooked? (4) How can a cancer pain assessment program be implemented? (5) What changes can be expected as a result of routine cancer pain assessments? The fundamental assumptions underlying this discussion are that health-care providers must understand the intensity of their patients' pain and the likely etiology of that discomfort to direct an appropriate diagnostic evaluation and to initiate and evaluate the success of therapy. Instituting a routine pain assessment program need not be difficult. The recommended procedures must be simple, quantifiable, relevant, and recorded in the medical record. Routine pain assessment will promote a heightened sense of awareness and responsibility about cancer pain issues in health-care providers, improved communication between the patient and the health-care provider, the development of cancer pain quality-assurance programs, and improved care for patients with cancer and pain.

摘要

对癌症疼痛进行全面评估是缓解疼痛的首要且或许是最重要的一步。然而,癌症疼痛患者的这一评估常常被忽视。本文论述了癌症疼痛评估的五个重要方面:(1)什么构成癌症疼痛评估?(2)为何它很重要?(3)为何它常常被忽视?(4)如何实施癌症疼痛评估方案?(5)常规癌症疼痛评估会带来哪些预期变化?本次讨论的基本假设是,医疗保健提供者必须了解患者疼痛的强度以及该不适可能的病因,以便指导进行适当的诊断评估,并启动和评估治疗的成效。建立一个常规疼痛评估方案并不一定困难。推荐的程序必须简单、可量化、相关且记录在病历中。常规疼痛评估将提高医疗保健提供者对癌症疼痛问题的认识和责任感,改善患者与医疗保健提供者之间的沟通,促进癌症疼痛质量保证方案的制定,并改善对癌症疼痛患者的护理。

相似文献

1
Assessment of cancer pain: a continuous challenge.癌症疼痛评估:一项持续的挑战。
Support Care Cancer. 1994 Mar;2(2):105-10. doi: 10.1007/BF00572091.
2
The physical examination in cancer pain assessment.
Semin Oncol Nurs. 1997 Feb;13(1):25-9. doi: 10.1016/s0749-2081(97)80046-0.
3
Cancer pain in palliative care: why is management so difficult?姑息治疗中的癌痛:为何管理如此困难?
Br J Community Nurs. 2005 Aug;10(8):362-7. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2005.10.8.18574.
4
Measurement issues in the comprehensive assessment of cancer pain.癌症疼痛综合评估中的测量问题。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 1997 Feb;13(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/s0749-2081(97)80045-9.
5
American Academy of Pediatrics Report of the Subcommittee on Assessment and Methodologic Issues in the Management of Pain in Childhood Cancer.美国儿科学会儿童癌症疼痛管理评估与方法学问题小组委员会报告
Pediatrics. 1990 Nov;86(5 Pt 2):814-7.
6
Undertreatment of cancer pain: barriers and remedies.
Support Care Cancer. 1993 Mar;1(2):74-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00366899.
7
Culture's effects on pain assessment and management.文化对疼痛评估和管理的影响。
Am J Nurs. 2010 Apr;110(4):38-47; quiz 48-9. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000370157.33223.6d.
8
Assessment tools for the evaluation of pain in the oncology patient.用于评估肿瘤患者疼痛的评估工具。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2007 Aug;11(4):259-64. doi: 10.1007/s11916-007-0201-9.
9
[Cancer pain assessment].
Masui. 2011 Sep;60(9):1046-52.
10
[Pain assessment in routine care : A prospective observational study in an orthopedic unit].[常规护理中的疼痛评估:骨科病房的一项前瞻性观察研究]
Schmerz. 2016 Jun;30(3):257-65. doi: 10.1007/s00482-016-0096-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between patient-reported symptoms and nurses' clinical impressions in cancer patients admitted to an acute palliative care unit.癌症患者入住急性姑息治疗病房时患者报告的症状与护士临床印象之间的关联。
J Palliat Med. 2012 Mar;15(3):301-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0403. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
2
Validation of a novel traditional chinese medicine pulse diagnostic model using an artificial neural network.基于人工神经网络的新型中医脉象诊断模型的验证。
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:685094. doi: 10.1155/2012/685094. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
3
Effects of docetaxel on pain due to metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Undertreatment of cancer pain: barriers and remedies.
Support Care Cancer. 1993 Mar;1(2):74-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00366899.
2
Use of the McGill pain questionnaire in the assessment of cancer pain: replicability and consistency.麦吉尔疼痛问卷在癌症疼痛评估中的应用:可重复性和一致性。
Pain. 1980 Jun;8(3):377-387. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(80)90081-0.
3
Pain measurement: the affective dimensional measure of the McGill pain questionnaire with a cancer pain population.疼痛测量:针对癌症疼痛患者群体的麦吉尔疼痛问卷情感维度测量
Curr Urol Rep. 2002 Jun;3(3):232-8. doi: 10.1007/s11934-002-0070-z.
Pain. 1982 Feb;12(2):153-163. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(82)90191-9.
4
Pain measurement: an overview.疼痛测量:综述
Pain. 1985 May;22(1):1-31. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90145-9.
5
The Memorial Pain Assessment Card. A valid instrument for the evaluation of cancer pain.纪念疼痛评估卡。一种评估癌症疼痛的有效工具。
Cancer. 1987 Sep 1;60(5):1151-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870901)60:5<1151::aid-cncr2820600538>3.0.co;2-g.
6
The use of next-of-kin to estimate pain in cancer patients.利用患者家属来评估癌症患者的疼痛程度。
Pain. 1988 Nov;35(2):171-178. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90224-2.
7
Toward a set of reliable and valid measures for chronic pain assessment and outcome research.迈向一套用于慢性疼痛评估和结局研究的可靠且有效的测量方法。
Pain. 1988 Dec;35(3):239-251. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90133-9.
8
The Edmonton staging system for cancer pain: preliminary report.
Pain. 1989 May;37(2):203-209. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90131-0.
9
Comparisons between patients' and nurses' assessment of pain and medication efficacy in severe burn injuries.
Pain. 1990 Feb;40(2):143-152. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90065-L.
10
Correlation of patient and caregiver ratings of cancer pain.癌症疼痛患者与照料者评分的相关性
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1991 Feb;6(2):53-7. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(91)90518-9.