• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用患者家属来评估癌症患者的疼痛程度。

The use of next-of-kin to estimate pain in cancer patients.

作者信息

O'Brien Jack, Francis Anita

机构信息

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1124 Columbia, Seattle, WA 98104 U.S.A.

出版信息

Pain. 1988 Nov;35(2):171-178. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90224-2.

DOI:10.1016/0304-3959(88)90224-2
PMID:3237431
Abstract

The clinical management of pain could be improved if more were known about the intensity and duration of the pain. The cancer patient, however, is often unable to communicate this information to caregivers. Relying on next-of-kin to provide information about the patient's pain could help, but little has been done to verify next-of-kin responses with respect to subjective experiences. For the present study 42 pairs of cancer patients and their next-of-kin were independently surveyed in 1982 in Washington state regarding their cancer pain and various aspects of medical treatment to determine whether proxies can give reliable responses. Close agreement between subject and next-of-kin was observed for the items which were salient and had a limited choice of responses, such as the presence of pain. Agreement in the aggregate was achieved for the items having several possible responses, such as the intensity and frequency of pain. Correspondence was virtually random for those items which had a variety of listed responses. The use of proxies in obtaining information, future research directions, and difficulties with measuring agreement are discussed.

摘要

如果能更多地了解疼痛的强度和持续时间,疼痛的临床管理就能得到改善。然而,癌症患者往往无法将这些信息传达给护理人员。依靠亲属提供有关患者疼痛的信息可能会有所帮助,但在核实亲属关于主观体验的回答方面几乎没有做什么工作。在1982年,针对42对癌症患者及其亲属在华盛顿州就他们的癌症疼痛和医疗治疗的各个方面进行了独立调查,以确定代理人是否能给出可靠的回答。对于那些突出且回答选择有限的项目,如疼痛的存在,观察到患者与亲属之间有密切的一致性。对于那些有几种可能回答的项目,如疼痛的强度和频率,总体上达成了一致。对于那些列出了各种回答的项目,一致性实际上是随机的。文中讨论了使用代理人获取信息的情况、未来的研究方向以及衡量一致性方面的困难。

相似文献

1
The use of next-of-kin to estimate pain in cancer patients.利用患者家属来评估癌症患者的疼痛程度。
Pain. 1988 Nov;35(2):171-178. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90224-2.
2
The family in hospital-based home care with special reference to terminally ill cancer patients.以医院为基础的家庭护理中的家庭,特别提及晚期癌症患者。
J Palliat Care. 1993 Spring;9(1):5-13.
3
Differences in patients' and family caregivers' perceptions of the pain experience influence patient and caregiver outcomes.患者与家庭护理人员对疼痛体验的认知差异会影响患者及护理人员的结局。
Pain. 1997 Aug;72(1-2):217-26. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00037-7.
4
The reliability of dietary data for self- and next-of-kin respondents.
Ann Epidemiol. 2002 May;12(4):278-83. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00268-x.
5
Autopsy of Adult Patients Deceased in an Academic Hospital: Considerations of Doctors and Next-of-Kin in the Consent Process.学术医院成年死亡患者的尸检:医生和近亲在同意过程中的考量
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 13;11(10):e0163811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163811. eCollection 2016.
6
Quality of life in spite of an unpredictable future: the next of kin of patients with multiple sclerosis.生活质量尽管未来不可预测:多发性硬化症患者的家属。
J Neurosci Nurs. 2010 Dec;42(6):331-41. doi: 10.1097/jnn.0b013e3181f8a5b2.
7
Validation of smoking history in cancer patients.癌症患者吸烟史的验证
Acta Oncol. 2008;47(6):1004-8. doi: 10.1080/02841860801935475.
8
Next of kin's experience of powerlessness and helplessness in palliative home care.亲属在姑息性家庭护理中感到无力和无助的经历。
Support Care Cancer. 2004 Feb;12(2):120-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0569-y. Epub 2003 Dec 18.
9
Judging the quality of care at the end of life: can proxies provide reliable information?评判临终关怀质量:代理人能否提供可靠信息?
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jan;56(1):95-109. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00011-4.
10
Pain in cancer patients: pain assessment by patients and family caregivers and problems experienced by caregivers.癌症患者的疼痛:患者及家庭护理人员的疼痛评估以及护理人员所经历的问题。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jul;23(7):1857-64. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2540-5. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Cohabitants Reliably Complete Questionnaires for Patients in a Terminal Cancer Stage when Assessing Quality of Life, Pain, Depression, and Anxiety?同居者在评估终末期癌症患者的生活质量、疼痛、抑郁和焦虑时,能可靠地完成问卷吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Apr 1;479(4):792-801. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001525.
2
Perception of quality of life by patients, partners and treating physicians.患者、伴侣及主治医生对生活质量的认知。
Qual Life Res. 2000;9(9):1041-52. doi: 10.1023/a:1016647407161.
3
The effect of mode of administration on medical outcomes study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS.
给药方式对艾滋病医学结局研究健康评级和欧洲五维健康量表得分的影响。
Qual Life Res. 1997 Jan;6(1):3-10. doi: 10.1023/a:1026471020698.
4
Criterion-based validation of the EORTC QLQ-C36 in advanced melanoma: the CIPS questionnaire and proxy raters.
Qual Life Res. 1996 Jun;5(3):375-86. doi: 10.1007/BF00433922.
5
Assessment of cancer pain: a continuous challenge.癌症疼痛评估:一项持续的挑战。
Support Care Cancer. 1994 Mar;2(2):105-10. doi: 10.1007/BF00572091.
6
Agreement between self reports and proxy reports of quality of life in epilepsy patients.癫痫患者生活质量的自我报告与代理报告之间的一致性。
Qual Life Res. 1995 Apr;4(2):159-68. doi: 10.1007/BF01833609.