Mayer F, Horstmann T, Kranenberg U, Röcker K, Dickhuth H H
Department of Sports Medicine, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen.
Int J Sports Med. 1994 Jan;15 Suppl 1:S26-31. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021106.
Adequate reliability studies of knee flexion and extension are currently available for isokinetic measurements, but not for the shoulder joint. For this reason, this study examines the variability (%) in the determination of peak torque (PT) and the angle at peak torque (AP) in the test-retest procedure. Differentiation is made between the various types of work (concentric, isometric, eccentric) and the degrees of freedom in the shoulder joint (flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, external rotation/internal rotation). The results show a variability of PT for concentric measurements of 15.0%-19.0% for all degrees of freedom; for flexion/extension and abduction/adduction in isometric and eccentric work, the variability is 17.5%-25.3%. External and internal rotation show generally greater deviation (29.0%-35.3%), except in concentric work. The angle at peak torque can only be reproduced to a limited degree (25.1%-41.1% variability). It is concluded that lower reproducibility can be attained for the shoulder joint compared to the knee joint, depending on the degree of freedom and exercise form tested. It appears meaningful to cite only ranges for the angle at peak torque.
目前有足够的关于膝关节屈伸的可靠性研究用于等速测量,但肩关节方面尚无此类研究。因此,本研究考察了重测过程中峰值扭矩(PT)和峰值扭矩角度(AP)测定的变异性(%)。对肩关节的不同工作类型(向心、等长、离心)和自由度(屈伸、外展/内收、外旋/内旋)进行了区分。结果显示,所有自由度的向心测量中,PT的变异性为15.0% - 19.0%;在等长和离心工作中的屈伸及外展/内收方面,变异性为17.5% - 25.3%。除向心工作外,外旋和内旋通常显示出更大的偏差(29.0% - 35.3%)。峰值扭矩角度只能在有限程度上再现(变异性为25.1% - 41.1%)。得出的结论是,与膝关节相比,肩关节的再现性较低,这取决于所测试的自由度和运动形式。似乎仅引用峰值扭矩角度的范围才有意义。