• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿拉巴马州农场经营者人群样本中的农业伤害情况。

Agricultural injuries among a population-based sample of farm operators in Alabama.

作者信息

Zhou C, Roseman J M

机构信息

Injury Control Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 1994 Mar;25(3):385-402. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700250307.

DOI:10.1002/ajim.4700250307
PMID:8160657
Abstract

A population-based study of the occurrence of agricultural injuries during the previous year was conducted in a simple random sample of 1,000 farm operators in Alabama in 1991. The participation rate was 86.2%. The cumulative 1-year incidence was 9.9% (95% CI = 7.7-12.1), based on the number of injuries, and 7.8% (95% CI = 5.8-9.8), based on the number of farmers injured. Limbs were the body parts most frequently injured: fingers (10.7%), hands or wrists (10.7%), and legs (8.9%). The leading external causes were machinery (28.6%), falls (23.2%), and animals (12.5%). There was a higher injury frequency at the end of the week, with a Saturday peak. Seasonal pattern of injury displayed a bimodal curve, one peak in spring, and a higher peak in early fall in September. The most risky farm types were forestry and dairy. The factors predictive of increased injury risk in multiple logistic regression included younger age, farm ownership, greater percent of working time spent on farming, more alcohol consumed, and prior residual injury. The results provide some indications for formulating agricultural injury control programs and for future research.

摘要

1991年,在阿拉巴马州对1000名农场经营者进行简单随机抽样,开展了一项基于人群的上一年农业伤害发生情况的研究。参与率为86.2%。基于伤害数量,1年累计发病率为9.9%(95%置信区间=7.7-12.1);基于受伤农民数量,发病率为7.8%(95%置信区间=5.8-9.8)。四肢是最常受伤的身体部位:手指(10.7%)、手或手腕(10.7%)以及腿部(8.9%)。主要外部致伤原因是机械(28.6%)、跌倒(23.2%)和动物(12.5%)。周末结束时伤害频率较高,周六达到峰值。伤害的季节模式呈双峰曲线,一个峰值在春季,9月初秋时出现更高峰值。风险最高的农场类型是林业和奶牛业。多因素逻辑回归中预测伤害风险增加的因素包括年龄较小、农场所有权、从事农业工作时间占比更大、饮酒量更多以及既往残留损伤。研究结果为制定农业伤害控制项目及未来研究提供了一些参考依据。

相似文献

1
Agricultural injuries among a population-based sample of farm operators in Alabama.阿拉巴马州农场经营者人群样本中的农业伤害情况。
Am J Ind Med. 1994 Mar;25(3):385-402. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700250307.
2
Agricultural injuries among older Kentucky farmers: The Farm Family Health and Hazard Surveillance Study.肯塔基州老年农民的农业伤害:农场家庭健康与危害监测研究
Am J Ind Med. 1998 Apr;33(4):341-53. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199804)33:4<341::aid-ajim4>3.0.co;2-x.
3
Behavioral and nonbehavioral risk factors for occupational injuries and health problems among Belgian farmers.比利时农民职业伤害和健康问题的行为和非行为风险因素。
J Agromedicine. 2011 Oct;16(4):299-310. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2011.605709.
4
A population based case-control study of agricultural injuries in children.一项基于人群的儿童农业伤害病例对照研究。
Inj Prev. 1996 Sep;2(3):192-6. doi: 10.1136/ip.2.3.192.
5
Understanding the ergonomic risk for musculoskeletal disorders in the United States agricultural sector.了解美国农业部门肌肉骨骼疾病的人体工程学风险。
Am J Ind Med. 2007 Jul;50(7):501-11. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20479.
6
Risk factors for agricultural injury: a case-control analysis of Iowa farmers in the Agricultural Health Study.农业伤害的风险因素:农业健康研究中爱荷华州农民的病例对照分析
J Agric Saf Health. 2003 Feb;9(1):5-18. doi: 10.13031/2013.12346.
7
Fatal work-related farm injuries in Canada, 1991-1995. Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance Program.1991 - 1995年加拿大与工作相关的致命农场伤害。加拿大农业伤害监测项目。
CMAJ. 1999 Jun 29;160(13):1843-8.
8
Risk factors for machinery-related injury among Iowa farmers: a case-control study nested in the Agricultural Health Study.爱荷华州农民中与机械相关伤害的危险因素:一项嵌套于农业健康研究中的病例对照研究。
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002 Oct-Dec;8(4):332-8. doi: 10.1179/107735202800338641.
9
The Hierarchy of Control in the Epidemic of Farm Injury.农场伤害流行中的控制层级
J Agromedicine. 2015;20(3):360-9. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1048401.
10
Risk factors for work related injury among male farmers.男性农民工伤的危险因素。
Occup Environ Med. 2009 May;66(5):312-8. doi: 10.1136/oem.2008.040808. Epub 2008 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Upper Limb's Injuries in Agriculture: A Systematic Review.农业上肢损伤:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 23;17(12):4501. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124501.
2
Occupational and Environmental Health Risks in Farm Labor.农场劳动中的职业与环境健康风险
Hum Organ. 1998 Fall;57(3):331-334. doi: 10.17730/humo.57.3.m77667m3j2136178.
3
Multisource surveillance for non-fatal work-related agricultural injuries.多源监测非致命性与工作相关的农业伤害。
J Agromedicine. 2020 Jan;25(1):86-95. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2019.1606746. Epub 2019 May 2.
4
Ergonomics and Beyond: Understanding How Chemical and Heat Exposures and Physical Exertions at Work Affect Functional Ability, Injury, and Long-Term Health.人体工程学及其他:了解工作中的化学物质暴露、热暴露和体力消耗如何影响功能能力、损伤和长期健康。
Hum Factors. 2016 Aug;58(5):777-95. doi: 10.1177/0018720816645457. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
5
Examining the types and payments of the disabilities of the insurants in the National Farmers' Health Insurance program in Taiwan.分析台湾地区全民健康保险被保险人失能类别与给付。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Oct 26;10:646. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-646.
6
Livestock-handling injuries in agriculture: an analysis of Colorado workers' compensation data.农业中的牲畜处理伤害:科罗拉多州工人赔偿数据的分析
Am J Ind Med. 2009 May;52(5):391-407. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20686.
7
Non-fatal occupational injuries in British agriculture.英国农业中的非致命职业伤害。
Occup Environ Med. 2007 Mar;64(3):150-4. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.024265. Epub 2006 Jun 20.
8
Farm work practices and farm injuries in Colorado.科罗拉多州的农场工作实践与农场伤害
Inj Prev. 2003 Sep;9(3):241-4. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.3.241.
9
Depressive symptoms in farm women: effects of health status and farming lifestyle characteristics, behaviors, and beliefs.农场女性的抑郁症状:健康状况及农业生活方式特征、行为和信念的影响
J Community Health. 2002 Jun;27(3):213-28. doi: 10.1023/a:1015206224421.
10
Agricultural work-related injuries among farmers in Hubei, People's Republic of China.中华人民共和国湖北省农民的农业工伤。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Aug;90(8):1269-76. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.8.1269.