Johnston K W
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Vasc Surg. 1994 May;19(5):888-900. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(94)70015-x.
On the basis of a prospective analysis of 147 patients undergoing surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and recorded in the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery Aneurysm Registry, this study defines the early and 6-year actuarial survival rates and determines the predictive variables that are associated with survival.
Ongoing follow-up of a cohort of patients was current at the time of analysis. To identify the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables that were associated with survival, statistical methods included chi-squared analysis, logistic regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox regression analysis.
The survival rate was 48.6% at 1 month, 34.7% +/- 4.2% at 3 years, and 22.0% +/- 4.0% at 6 years. When preoperative and intraoperative variables were considered and logistic regression analysis was used, the highest probability of early in-hospital survival was associated with preoperative creatinine levels of 1.3 mg/dl or less, intraoperative urine output of 200 ml or greater, and infrarenal clamp site. The highest probability of late survival, as calculated by the Cox proportional hazards method, was predicted by the patient's age and total urine output during the procedure. When all variables, including postoperative complications, were considered, late survival was highest if intraoperative urine output was 200 ml or greater and respiratory failure and myocardial infarction did not occur. For those patients with ruptured AAA who survived operation (i.e., greater than 1 month), the long-term survival rate was significantly lower than a comparable group undergoing repair of nonruptured AAA.
Patients who survive repair of a ruptured AAA have a lower late survival rate than patients undergoing elective repair. When a patient is evaluated before operation, no combination of preoperative variables could identify those patients with little or no chance of survival; hence, the decision to repair a ruptured AAA should be made on clinical grounds. However, after surgery (when information on intraoperative and postoperative variables is also available), the results of this study provide a basis for the surgeon to use these prognostic variables to assist clinical judgment and guide discussions on prognosis with the family and to identify those patients who have such a low chance of early and late survival that further aggressive treatment may be futile.
基于对147例接受破裂腹主动脉瘤(AAA)手术患者的前瞻性分析(这些患者记录于加拿大血管外科学会动脉瘤登记处),本研究确定了早期和6年精算生存率,并确定了与生存相关的预测变量。
在分析时对一组患者进行持续随访。为了确定与生存相关的术前、术中和术后变量,统计方法包括卡方分析、逻辑回归分析、Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox回归分析。
1个月时生存率为48.6%,3年时为34.7%±4.2%,6年时为22.0%±4.0%。在考虑术前和术中变量并使用逻辑回归分析时,早期院内生存的最高概率与术前肌酐水平为1.3mg/dl或更低、术中尿量为200ml或更多以及肾下钳夹部位相关。通过Cox比例风险法计算,晚期生存的最高概率由患者年龄和手术过程中的总尿量预测。当考虑所有变量,包括术后并发症时,如果术中尿量为200ml或更多且未发生呼吸衰竭和心肌梗死,则晚期生存率最高。对于那些手术存活的破裂AAA患者(即超过1个月),长期生存率显著低于接受非破裂AAA修复的可比组。
破裂AAA修复术后存活的患者晚期生存率低于接受择期修复的患者。在术前评估患者时,没有任何术前变量组合能够识别那些生存机会很小或没有生存机会的患者;因此,修复破裂AAA的决定应基于临床依据。然而,手术后(此时也可获得术中和术后变量的信息),本研究结果为外科医生提供了一个基础,使其能够使用这些预后变量来辅助临床判断,并指导与家属就预后进行讨论,以及识别那些早期和晚期生存机会极低以至于进一步积极治疗可能徒劳的患者。