Hessemer T, Kolling G H
Universitäts-Augenklinik Heidelberg.
Ophthalmologe. 1994 Feb;91(1):36-40.
We compared the most commonly used exophthalmometer according to Hertel (HE), which is criticized in the literature because of its low reliability, with the prototype of a new slitlamp exophthalmometer (SE). The apex of the eye and an index mark, which is in a fixed relation to the orbit, can be observed simultaneously, using a system of two mirrows. The advantages are a more accurate scale (up to 5/100 mm) and the independence of measurements. Exophthalmometry was performed in two experiments. First, we measured an artificial eye to determine the intra- and interobserver variation. The values of HE were 0.18 mm and 0.27 mm, respectively, those of SLE less than 0.08 mm. Second, we measured ten healthy volunteers to determine the interobserver variation. The value of SLE was significantly smaller (P < 0.01) than the value of HE. In conclusion, the SE is more reliable than the HE concerning the intra- and interobserver variation and can be recommended for research purposes as a useful alternative to the HE.
我们将最常用的根据赫特尔(Hertel)原理设计的眼球突出计(HE)与一种新型裂隙灯眼球突出计(SE)的原型进行了比较。由于其可靠性低,HE在文献中受到批评。利用一个双镜系统,可以同时观察到眼球的顶点和一个与眼眶保持固定关系的指标标记。其优点是刻度更精确(可达5/100毫米)且测量具有独立性。眼球突出度测量进行了两个实验。首先,我们测量了一只假眼以确定观察者内部和观察者之间的差异。HE的值分别为0.18毫米和0.27毫米,SE的值小于0.08毫米。其次,我们测量了十名健康志愿者以确定观察者之间的差异。SE的值显著小于HE的值(P < 0.01)。总之,就观察者内部和观察者之间的差异而言,SE比HE更可靠,并且作为HE的一种有用替代品,可推荐用于研究目的。