Zenger M, Brenner M, Hua P, Haruno M, Wilson A F
Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange 92668.
Crit Care Med. 1994 May;22(5):783-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199405000-00012.
The measurement of oxygen uptake and CO2 production in critically ill patients requires invasive monitoring or complex analysis equipment. This study investigates the hypothesis that oxygen uptake and CO2 production can be accurately determined by measuring oxygen and CO2 concentrations in samples from inspiratory and expiratory ventilator circuitry, using a standard blood gas analyzer.
Prospective comparison of CO2 production and oxygen uptake measurements determined by use of a blood gas analyzer vs. a mass spectrometer.
University teaching hospital medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs).
Critically ill patients (n = 46) receiving mechanical ventilation in the ICUs.
PO2 and PCO2 were obtained with two new techniques and compared simultaneously with measurements on a mass spectrometer in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. Two methods were evaluated: a) arterial blood gas analyzer measurements of PO2 and PCO2 from fluid collected in traps on the inspiratory and expiratory limbs of the ventilator circuitry; b) PO2 and PCO2 measurements of inspiratory and expiratory gas samples collected in bags and injected directly into an arterial blood gas analyzer. Oxygen consumption and CO2 production were compared, using both methods of gas measurements.
Direct injection of gas samples collected in a bag from inspiratory and expiratory limbs of a breathing circuit into the arterial blood gas analyzer correlated very closely with mass spectrometer measurements for all variables (n = 32 sample measurements in 25 patients): fractional oxygen (r2 = .99, slope = 1.02, bias = 0.37%, precision = 0.54), fractional expired CO2 (r2 = .90, slope = 0.86, bias = -0.10%, precision = 0.15), oxygen uptake (r2 = .87, slope = 0.99, bias = 21.6 mL/min, precision = 38.0), and CO2 production (r2 = .98, slope = 0.95, bias = 7.90 mL/min, precision = 15.3). In contrast, although fractional oxygen and CO2 concentrations were approximated by analysis of fluid collected from inspiratory and expiratory traps, the values did not correlate well enough with mass spectrometer values to yield reasonable oxygen uptake or CO2 production results.
We have demonstrated that direct Fick oxygen uptake and CO2 production can be accurately determined in mechanically ventilated patients, using direct injection of collected gas samples into standard blood gas analyzers. This simple, inexpensive technique can be performed using equipment readily available in any hospital.
对重症患者的氧摄取量和二氧化碳生成量进行测量需要侵入性监测或复杂的分析设备。本研究调查了这样一个假设,即使用标准血气分析仪,通过测量来自吸气和呼气呼吸机回路样本中的氧气和二氧化碳浓度,可以准确测定氧摄取量和二氧化碳生成量。
使用血气分析仪与质谱仪测定二氧化碳生成量和氧摄取量的前瞻性比较。
大学教学医院的内科和外科重症监护病房(ICU)。
在ICU接受机械通气的重症患者(n = 46)。
采用两种新技术获取氧分压(PO2)和二氧化碳分压(PCO2),并与重症机械通气患者质谱仪的测量结果同时进行比较。评估了两种方法:a)用动脉血气分析仪测量呼吸机回路吸气和呼气支收集的液体中的PO2和PCO2;b)测量收集在袋子中并直接注入动脉血气分析仪的吸气和呼气气体样本中的PO2和PCO2。使用两种气体测量方法比较氧消耗量和二氧化碳生成量。
将从呼吸回路吸气和呼气支收集在袋子中的气体样本直接注入动脉血气分析仪,对于所有变量,其结果与质谱仪测量结果密切相关(25例患者中的32次样本测量):氧分数(r2 = 0.99,斜率 = 1.02,偏差 = 0.37%,精密度 = 0.54)、呼出二氧化碳分数(r2 = 0.90,斜率 = 0.86,偏差 = -0.10%,精密度 = 0.15)、氧摄取量(r2 = 0.87,斜率 = 0.99,偏差 = 21.6 mL/min,精密度 = 38.0)和二氧化碳生成量(r2 = 0.98,斜率 = 0.95,偏差 = 7.90 mL/min,精密度 = 15.3)。相比之下,虽然通过分析从吸气和呼气收集器收集的液体可近似得到氧和二氧化碳浓度,但这些值与质谱仪值的相关性不够好,无法得出合理的氧摄取量或二氧化碳生成量结果。
我们已经证明,对于机械通气患者,将收集的气体样本直接注入标准血气分析仪,可以准确测定直接Fick氧摄取量和二氧化碳生成量。这种简单、廉价的技术可以使用任何医院都容易获得的设备来进行。