Chaturvedi N, McKeigue P M
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College and Middlesex School of Medicine, London.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Apr;48(2):107-11. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.2.107.
OBJECTIVE--Research into the health of minority ethnic groups is often restricted by methodological difficulties. These include the lack of accurate population denominators, the choice of an appropriate sampling frame, correctly assigning ethnic group, and biases in techniques used for sampling and investigation. This article reviews the available sources or mortality and morbidity data, and assesses their uses and limitations for research involving ethnic minority groups. Suitable sampling frames and review methods used to assign ethnicity are discussed. Sources of bias are high-lighted and methods used to overcome these biases are presented. CRITERIA FOR INCLUSION OF ARTICLES--Articles have been chosen which best illustrate the problems encountered and show how these problems can be addressed. CONCLUSIONS--The increased documentation of ethnic origin on routine data sources is welcomed, but attention must be paid to ensuring that congruent definitions in data collection are used. The worrying consequences of the Commission of European Communities directive, which describes the need for explicit consent to be obtained from subjects before data is used for anything other than its original purpose, are discussed.
目的——对少数族裔健康状况的研究常常受到方法学难题的限制。这些难题包括缺乏准确的人口分母、合适抽样框架的选择、族裔群体的正确划分,以及抽样和调查技术中的偏差。本文回顾了现有的死亡率和发病率数据来源,并评估了它们在涉及少数族裔群体研究中的用途和局限性。讨论了适用于划分族裔的抽样框架和审查方法。强调了偏差来源,并介绍了用于克服这些偏差的方法。文章入选标准——选择了能最好地说明所遇到问题并展示如何解决这些问题的文章。结论——常规数据源上族裔出身记录的增加是值得欢迎的,但必须注意确保在数据收集时使用一致的定义。讨论了欧洲共同体指令令人担忧的后果,该指令规定在数据用于其原始目的以外的任何用途之前,必须获得受试者的明确同意。