Höger C, Temme M, Geiken G
Abteilung für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr. 1994 Mar;22(1):16-22.
In an evaluation study we investigated the effectiveness of the reflecting team approach compared to eclectic child psychiatric treatment in an outpatient setting and the indications for each type of treatment. The relationship between treatment outcome and diagnostic data obtained with the Multi-axial Classification Scheme was examined in 22 families treated with the reflecting team approach and in a second group of families matched on all important sociodemographic and diagnostic variables but receiving eclectic treatment. No difference was found between the two groups regarding symptom improvement or changes in family functioning. Regarding satisfaction with treatment, the reflecting team approach was superior to the eclectic modality. In the reflecting team group parental mental disorder and inadequate intra-familial communication (according to the new fifth axis of the Multi-axial Classification Scheme) had a negative effect on outcome.
在一项评估研究中,我们调查了在门诊环境下,与折衷儿童精神治疗方法相比,反思团队方法的有效性以及每种治疗方法的适应症。我们对采用反思团队方法治疗的22个家庭以及另一组在所有重要社会人口统计学和诊断变量上匹配但接受折衷治疗的家庭,研究了治疗结果与通过多轴分类方案获得的诊断数据之间的关系。两组在症状改善或家庭功能变化方面未发现差异。在治疗满意度方面,反思团队方法优于折衷治疗方式。在反思团队组中,父母精神障碍和家庭内部沟通不足(根据多轴分类方案的新第五轴)对治疗结果有负面影响。