Suppr超能文献

非洛地平或依那普利单药及联合治疗老年收缩期高血压患者。

Mono- and combination therapy with felodipine or enalapril in elderly patients with systolic hypertension.

作者信息

Wing L M, Russell A E, Tonkin A L, Watts R W, Bune A J, West M J, Chalmers J P

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Blood Press. 1994 Mar;3(1-2):90-6. doi: 10.3109/08037059409101527.

Abstract

Using a randomised double-blind crossover design with Latin square allocation of treatments in 20 subjects (7 male, 13 female-ages: 61-87 years) with systolic hypertension, we investigated the efficacy and tolerability of once daily felodipine (extended release) 5-20 mg, enalapril 5-20 mg and their combination compared with placebo in four treatment phases each of 6 weeks duration. During each phase, doses were titrated to achieve a predose clinic supine systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or to a predetermined maximum dose. In both the felodipine and combination phases, predose supine and standing systolic and diastolic pressures were significantly reduced compared with the placebo phase (decrease in supine pressure: -13/-5 and -18/-7, respectively). Only predose supine diastolic pressure was significantly reduced (-3 mmHg) compared to placebo in the enalapril phase. In combination the effects of the two drugs on predose blood pressure were additive. There was a 40-60% increase in reported symptoms in the felodipine and combination phases compared with the placebo and enalapril phases. Thus, in elderly subjects with systolic hypertension, felodipine effectively reduces blood pressure throughout the dose interval but with vasodilator adverse effects. In contrast, enalapril is well tolerated but is less effective in reducing blood pressure throughout the whole dose interval.

摘要

我们采用随机双盲交叉设计,对20名(7名男性,13名女性,年龄61 - 87岁)收缩期高血压患者进行拉丁方治疗分配,在四个为期6周的治疗阶段中,研究了每日一次服用5 - 20毫克非洛地平(缓释片)、5 - 20毫克依那普利及其联合用药与安慰剂相比的疗效和耐受性。在每个阶段,调整剂量以达到给药前临床仰卧位收缩压140 mmHg或达到预定最大剂量。在非洛地平阶段和联合用药阶段,给药前仰卧位和站立位的收缩压和舒张压与安慰剂阶段相比均显著降低(仰卧位血压下降分别为:-13 / -5和-18 / -7)。在依那普利阶段,仅给药前仰卧位舒张压与安慰剂相比显著降低(-3 mmHg)。联合使用时,两种药物对给药前血压的作用是相加的。与安慰剂阶段和依那普利阶段相比,非洛地平阶段和联合用药阶段报告的症状增加了40 - 60%。因此,在老年收缩期高血压患者中,非洛地平在整个剂量间隔内有效降低血压,但有血管舒张的不良反应。相比之下,依那普利耐受性良好,但在整个剂量间隔内降低血压的效果较差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验