• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非洛地平与依那普利单药治疗原发性高血压的比较。

Comparison of felodipine and enalapril monotherapy in essential hypertension.

作者信息

Watts R W, Dufek A, Wing L M

机构信息

Investigator Clinic, Port Lincoln, Australia.

出版信息

Blood Press. 1993 Mar;2(1):53-8. doi: 10.3109/08037059309077527.

DOI:10.3109/08037059309077527
PMID:8193732
Abstract

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with felodipine and enalapril in patients with essential hypertension using a double-blind randomised crossover design. Thirty-five subjects (22 male, 13 female--ages: median 48 years, range 31-69 years) entered the randomised phases of the study and 32 subjects completed the study. Following a 4-week run-in placebo phase, the treatments were felodipine ("Plendil ER") 5-20 mg and enalapril 5-20 mg orally once daily for 8 weeks, each with matching placebos. Dose titration was at 2 and/or 4 weeks in each phase. Number of subjects with each different end-of-phase dose were for felodipine: 5 mg--8, 10 mg--11, 20 mg--13 and enalapril: 5 mg--6, 10 mg--9, 20 mg--17. Predose supine blood pressure (mean +/- SEM) was reduced in both active treatment phases compared with the run-in phase (159 + 2/101 +/- 1), but there was no significant difference in blood pressure between the active phases: felodipine 143 +/- 2/90 +/- 1 and enalapril 146 +/- 2/92 +/- 1. The most common adverse effects were for felodipine: headache, flushing, ankle swelling; and for enalapril: cough. Felodipine and enalapril as once daily monotherapy are thus of similar antihypertensive efficacy but with predictably different adverse effect profiles.

摘要

本研究采用双盲随机交叉设计,比较了非洛地平和依那普利单药治疗原发性高血压患者的疗效和耐受性。35名受试者(22名男性,13名女性,年龄中位数48岁,范围31 - 69岁)进入研究的随机阶段,32名受试者完成了研究。在为期4周的导入期安慰剂阶段后,治疗药物为非洛地平(“波依定缓释片”)5 - 20mg和依那普利5 - 20mg,均每日口服1次,持续8周,各伴有匹配的安慰剂。每个阶段在第2周和/或第4周进行剂量滴定。每个不同阶段末剂量的受试者数量,非洛地平组为:5mg - 8例,10mg - 11例,20mg - 13例;依那普利组为:5mg - 6例,10mg - 9例,20mg - 17例。与导入期相比,两个活性治疗阶段的给药前仰卧血压(均值±标准误)均有所降低(159 + 2/101 ± 1),但活性治疗阶段之间的血压无显著差异:非洛地平组为143 ± 2/90 ± 1,依那普利组为146 ± 2/92 ± 1。最常见的不良反应,非洛地平组为:头痛、面部潮红、脚踝肿胀;依那普利组为:咳嗽。因此,非洛地平和依那普利作为每日一次的单药治疗,具有相似的降压疗效,但不良反应谱可预测地有所不同。

相似文献

1
Comparison of felodipine and enalapril monotherapy in essential hypertension.非洛地平与依那普利单药治疗原发性高血压的比较。
Blood Press. 1993 Mar;2(1):53-8. doi: 10.3109/08037059309077527.
2
Mono- and combination therapy with felodipine or enalapril in elderly patients with systolic hypertension.非洛地平或依那普利单药及联合治疗老年收缩期高血压患者。
Blood Press. 1994 Mar;3(1-2):90-6. doi: 10.3109/08037059409101527.
3
Comparison and interaction of low dose felodipine and enalapril in the treatment of essential hypertension in elderly subjects.小剂量非洛地平与依那普利治疗老年原发性高血压的比较及相互作用
Am J Hypertens. 1992 Apr;5(4 Pt 1):238-43. doi: 10.1093/ajh/5.4.238.
4
Long-term efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the combination of enalapril and felodipine ER in the treatment of hypertension. Enalapril-Felodipine ER Factorial Study Group.依那普利与非洛地平缓释片联合治疗高血压的长期疗效、耐受性及安全性。依那普利-非洛地平缓释片析因研究组。
Clin Ther. 1998 May-Jun;20(3):527-38. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(98)80062-3.
5
Improved efficacy with maintained tolerability in the treatment of primary hypertension. Comparison between the felodipine-metoprolol combination tablet and monotherapy with enalapril. Swedish Multicentre Group.非洛地平-美托洛尔复方片剂与依那普利单药治疗原发性高血压的疗效比较:疗效提高且耐受性良好。瑞典多中心研究组
J Hum Hypertens. 1999 Jan;13(1):55-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000724.
6
Hemodynamic comparisons of enalapril and felodipine and their combination.依那普利与非洛地平及其联合用药的血流动力学比较。
Kidney Int Suppl. 1992 May;36:S78-81.
7
Felodipine, metoprolol and their combination compared with placebo in isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly.非洛地平、美托洛尔及其联合用药与安慰剂治疗老年单纯收缩期高血压的比较。
Blood Press. 1994 Mar;3(1-2):82-9. doi: 10.3109/08037059409101526.
8
A comparison of isradipine and felodipine in Australian patients with hypertension: focus on ankle oedema. The Physician's Study Group.澳大利亚高血压患者中伊拉地平与非洛地平的比较:关注踝部水肿。医师研究小组。
Blood Press. 1993 Sep;2(3):205-11. doi: 10.3109/08037059309077552.
9
Felodipine-metoprolol combination tablet: a valuable option to initiate antihypertensive therapy?非洛地平-美托洛尔复方片剂:启动抗高血压治疗的一个有价值的选择?
Am J Hypertens. 1999 Sep;12(9 Pt 1):915-20. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00067-9.
10
A multicenter comparison of isradipine and felodipine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. The Physician's Study Group.
Am J Hypertens. 1993 Mar;6(3 Pt 2):44S-48S. doi: 10.1093/ajh/6.3.44s.