Weisz J R, McCabe M A, Dennig M D
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles 90024-1563.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994 Apr;62(2):324-32. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.62.2.324.
The literature suggests that optimal adjustment to relatively uncontrollable stressors may require adjusting oneself to the stressors rather than trying to alter them. This possibility was explored, for low-controllability stressors (e.g., painful medical procedures) associated with leukemia. Children's reports of coping strategies and goals were classified as primary control coping (attempts to alter objective conditions), secondary control coping (attempts to adjust oneself to objective conditions), or relinquished control (no attempt to cope). Secondary control coping was positively associated with (a) general behavioral adjustment assessed by the Child Behavior Checklist and (b) illness-specific adjustment assessed by children's own distress ratings and by behavioral observations during painful procedures. All significant group differences showed better adjustment among secondary control children than among the primary or relinquished groups.
文献表明,要对相对无法控制的压力源进行最佳调适,可能需要让自己适应这些压力源,而不是试图改变它们。针对与白血病相关的低可控性压力源(如痛苦的医疗程序),人们探讨了这种可能性。儿童对应对策略和目标的报告被分为初级控制应对(试图改变客观状况)、次级控制应对(试图让自己适应客观状况)或放弃控制(不尝试应对)。次级控制应对与以下方面呈正相关:(a) 通过儿童行为清单评估的总体行为调适,以及 (b) 通过儿童自身痛苦评分和痛苦程序期间的行为观察评估的疾病特异性调适。所有显著的组间差异都表明,次级控制组儿童的调适情况优于初级控制组或放弃控制组儿童。