Ohlsson K, Attewell R G, Johnsson B, Ahlm A, Skerfving S
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Ergonomics. 1994 May;37(5):891-7. doi: 10.1080/00140139408963698.
To study the usefulness of a screening questionnaire for neck/upper extremity complaints, 165 women in either repetitive industrial, or mobile and varied work, were studied by the questionnaire and by a detailed clinical physical examination. A total of 94 subjects recorded complaints in the questionnaire. In 140 subjects findings were recorded at the examination. Most subjects with findings at the clinical examination of shoulders reported complaints in the questionnaire (sensitivity 80%). For the other anatomical regions, the sensitivity was rather low (42-65%). For all regions, most subjects without findings reported no complaints (specificity 77-97%). A total of 75 subjects were given clinical diagnoses according to a set of predetermined diagnostic criteria. The capacity of the questionnaire to identify diagnoses of shoulders was higher (sensitivity 92%) than for the other regions (66-79%). Of subjects who did not qualify for diagnosis, a majority (specificity 71-81%) did not report complaints in the questionnaire. We conclude that the questionnaire approach gives a fairly good picture of the neck/upper extremity status of a working female population. However, a clear view of the size of a problem is obtained only by a detailed clinical examination, particularly as regards the neck, elbows and hands, for which the questionnaire gave an underestimate.
为研究一份针对颈部/上肢不适的筛查问卷的效用,我们通过该问卷以及详细的临床体格检查,对165名从事重复性工业工作或流动性多样工作的女性进行了研究。共有94名受试者在问卷中记录了不适情况。在140名受试者的检查中记录到了相关发现。在临床检查中肩部有异常发现的大多数受试者在问卷中也记录了不适(敏感性80%)。对于其他解剖区域,敏感性相当低(42 - 65%)。对于所有区域,大多数检查无异常发现的受试者在问卷中也未报告不适(特异性77 - 97%)。根据一组预先确定的诊断标准,共有75名受试者得到了临床诊断。问卷识别肩部诊断的能力高于其他区域(敏感性92%)(其他区域为66 - 79%)。在未达到诊断标准的受试者中,大多数(特异性71 - 81%)在问卷中未报告不适。我们得出结论,问卷法能较好地反映职业女性群体的颈部/上肢状况。然而,只有通过详细的临床检查才能清楚了解问题的严重程度,特别是对于颈部、肘部和手部,问卷对此估计不足。