• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会保障与老年工人。

Social Security and older workers.

作者信息

Leonesio M V

机构信息

Division of Economic Research, Office of Research and Statistics, Social Security Administration.

出版信息

Soc Secur Bull. 1993 Summer;56(2):47-57.

PMID:8211568
Abstract

Many observers have noted that the long-term decline in labor-force participation by older Americans may reflect the evolution of social institutions that effectively discourage work. Often cited factors include employer discrimination against older workers, private pension plans that penalize continued employment, and the Social Security system. Various policies, such as eliminating Social Security's retirement test, have been proposed with a view to eliminating or lessening employment barriers. This article summarizes the economic evidence that addresses the role played by the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) programs in retirement decisions. OASI is shown to have statistically significant effects on both the timing of retirement and the amount of postretirement work; however, the influence is not large relative to the many other factors that determine the labor-supply decisions of older workers. Consequently, changes in Social Security policy of the type and magnitude that are politically feasible are unlikely to result in large changes in retirement behavior.

摘要

许多观察家指出,美国老年人劳动力参与率的长期下降可能反映了社会制度的演变,这些制度实际上不利于工作。经常被提及的因素包括雇主对老年工人的歧视、惩罚继续就业的私人养老金计划以及社会保障体系。为了消除或减少就业障碍,人们提出了各种政策,比如取消社会保障的退休测试。本文总结了关于老年和遗属保险(OASI)计划在退休决策中所起作用的经济证据。结果表明,OASI对退休时间和退休后工作时长均具有统计学上的显著影响;然而,相对于决定老年工人劳动力供给决策的许多其他因素而言,这种影响并不大。因此,在政治上可行的那种类型和规模的社会保障政策变化不太可能导致退休行为发生重大改变。

相似文献

1
Social Security and older workers.社会保障与老年工人。
Soc Secur Bull. 1993 Summer;56(2):47-57.
2
Lifetime distributional effects of Social Security retirement benefits.社会保障退休福利的终身分配效应。
Soc Secur Bull. 2003;65(1):33-61.
3
Retirement against the demographic trend: more older people living longer, working less, and saving less.违背人口趋势的退休现象:越来越多的老年人寿命延长,工作减少,储蓄减少。
Demography. 1997 Feb;34(1):83-95.
4
Characteristics of individuals with integrated pensions.拥有综合养老金的个人特征。
Soc Secur Bull. 1999;62(3):28-40.
5
Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.终身收入模式、未来社会保障福利的分配以及养老金改革的影响。
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(4):74-98.
6
Social Security's special minimum benefit.社会保障的特别最低福利。
Soc Secur Bull. 2001;64(2):1-15.
7
Evaluating the initial impact of eliminating the retirement earnings test.评估取消退休收入测试的初步影响。
Soc Secur Bull. 2003;65(1):1-15.
8
Social Security, retirement incentives, and retirement behavior: an international perspective.社会保障、退休激励措施与退休行为:国际视角
EBRI Issue Brief. 1999 May(209):1-22.
9
Social Security: a financial appraisal for the median voter.社会保障:对中位选民的财务评估。
Soc Secur Bull. 2001;64(2):57-65.
10
Disabled workers and the indexing of Social Security benefits.残疾工人与社会保障福利指数化
Soc Secur Bull. 2007;67(4):21-50.