Lotti M, Moretto A, Capodicasa E, Bertolazzi M, Peraica M, Scapellato M L
Universitá degli Studi di Padova, Istituto di Medicina del Lavoro, Italy.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1993 Oct;122(2):165-71. doi: 10.1006/taap.1993.1184.
This paper combines new and old data in order to offer a modified perspective of the mechanism of organophosphate-induced delayed polyneuropathy. Neuropathy target esterase (NTE) is though to be the molecular target and neuropathy to be initiated with a two-step mechanism: progressive inhibition of NTE and aging of the phosphorylated enzyme. When neuropathic organophosphates modify more than 70% of NTE in this way, neuropathy develops 2 weeks later. Other chemicals producing an inhibited NTE, which is incapable of aging, were thought to be not neuropathic. When given before a challenging dose of a neuropathic organophosphate they protect animals from neuropathy. However, recent evidence indicates that aging may not always be essential in causing neuropathy. In fact, mipafox and methamidophos as well as certain classic protective inhibitors such as carbamate and sulfonyl fluoride form an inhibited NTE which apparently does not age and yet produces neuropathy. We propose that all NTE inhibitors may have the potential to cause neuropathy. In analogy with pharmacological models of drug-receptor interactions, NTE inhibitors might have variable intrinsic activities to initiate neuropathy once attached to the protein. Strong neuropathic chemicals require about 70% inhibition of NTE, others 80-90%, and the least potent almost 100%. These differences have been amplified by means of promotion. Different levels of NTE inhibition as caused by different compounds were promoted by the same dose of phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride to similar degrees of ataxia. Conversely nearly complete NTE inhibitions obtained in chicks with different chemicals were promoted to varying severities of ataxia. Protection from delayed polyneuropathy by the least neuropathic inhibitors can be explained by their weak intrinsic activity: occupying NTE, they prevent the binding of more neuropathic compounds. Methamidophos represents a particular example because it is protective at lower doses and neuropathic at high doses. Moreover, the levels of NTE inhibited by methamidophos which can be promoted to neuropathy are lower than those required for classic protective chemicals and higher than those of classic neuropathic OPs. This suggests that methamidophos has an intermediate position between the most and the least neuropathic NTE inhibitors.
本文结合新旧数据,旨在提供一种关于有机磷酸酯诱导的迟发性多发性神经病发病机制的修正观点。神经病变靶酯酶(NTE)被认为是分子靶点,且神经病是通过两步机制引发的:NTE的渐进性抑制以及磷酸化酶的老化。当神经性有机磷酸酯以这种方式使超过70%的NTE发生改变时,2周后会发展为神经病。其他产生被抑制的、无法老化的NTE的化学物质被认为不具有神经毒性。在给予具有神经毒性的有机磷酸酯挑战性剂量之前给予它们,可保护动物不发生神经病。然而,最近的证据表明,老化在导致神经病方面可能并非总是必不可少的。事实上,丙胺氟磷和甲胺磷以及某些经典的保护性抑制剂,如氨基甲酸盐和磺酰氟,会形成一种明显不会老化但仍会导致神经病的被抑制的NTE。我们提出,所有NTE抑制剂都可能有导致神经病发作的潜力。类似于药物 - 受体相互作用的药理学模型,NTE抑制剂一旦与蛋白质结合,可能具有引发神经病的不同内在活性。强神经毒性化学物质需要抑制约70%的NTE,其他的需要抑制80 - 90%,而效力最低的几乎需要抑制100%。这些差异通过促进作用被放大。相同剂量的苯甲磺酰氟将不同化合物引起的不同水平的NTE抑制促进到相似程度的共济失调。相反,用不同化学物质在雏鸡中获得的几乎完全的NTE抑制被促进到不同严重程度的共济失调。最弱神经毒性抑制剂对迟发性多发性神经病的保护作用可以通过其较弱的内在活性来解释:占据NTE,它们可防止更强神经毒性化合物的结合。甲胺磷是一个特殊的例子,因为它在较低剂量时具有保护作用,而在高剂量时具有神经毒性。此外,可被促进发展为神经病的甲胺磷抑制NTE的水平低于经典保护性化学物质所需的水平,高于经典神经毒性有机磷酸酯的水平。这表明甲胺磷在最强和最弱神经毒性的NTE抑制剂之间处于中间位置。