Ike R W, O'Rourke K S
Division of Rheumatology, Rackham Arthritis Research Unit, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0358.
Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Oct;36(10):1353-63. doi: 10.1002/art.1780361005.
To determine whether intraarticular abnormalities in osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee can be detected as well by needle arthroscopy as by standard arthroscopy.
Needle arthroscopy followed by standard arthroscopy was performed on 10 patients with knee OA (diagnosed according to American College of Rheumatology criteria) whose symptoms were not entirely attributable to the OA and were therefore an indication for further evaluation. Each knee was assessed for abnormalities of the menisci, articular cartilage (6 sites), and synovium (6 sites).
Evaluation of the 18 menisci visualized with both techniques yielded the same results: 6 abnormal and 12 normal. Among the 54 articular cartilage sites evaluable with both procedures, 16 were judged normal by both needle arthroscopy and standard arthroscopy. Of the 38 cartilage sites judged abnormal by standard arthroscopy, 34 (89%) were abnormal by needle arthroscopy. Both techniques indicated cartilage changes were the same at 42 (78%) of the 54 sites; changes at the other 12 sites were 1 grade higher by standard arthroscopy than by needle arthroscopy. Both needle arthroscopy and standard arthroscopy revealed 51 evaluable sites in the synovium. Of 34 areas judged abnormal by standard arthroscopy, 24 (71%) were also judged abnormal by needle arthroscopy; 17 areas were judged normal by both techniques. The 2 techniques assigned the same macroscopic score in 27 (53%) of 51 areas of the synovium, with a higher grade by standard arthroscopy in all but 1 of the other 16 areas.
These pilot data suggest that in knee OA, needle arthroscopy can 1) accurately detect meniscal abnormalities, 2) detect cartilage abnormalities, but may underestimate the severity, and 3) detect most synovial abnormalities, but often underestimates the severity. Needle arthroscopy is a potentially valuable rheumatologic tool for the assessment of OA of the knee.
确定膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的关节内异常通过针式关节镜检查与标准关节镜检查是否能同样被检测到。
对10例膝关节OA患者(根据美国风湿病学会标准诊断)进行针式关节镜检查,随后进行标准关节镜检查,这些患者的症状并非完全由OA引起,因此需要进一步评估。对每个膝关节的半月板、关节软骨(6个部位)和滑膜(6个部位)进行异常评估。
用两种技术观察的18个半月板评估结果相同:6个异常,12个正常。在两种检查方法均可评估的54个关节软骨部位中,针式关节镜检查和标准关节镜检查均判定16个部位正常。在标准关节镜检查判定为异常的38个软骨部位中,针式关节镜检查显示34个(89%)异常。两种技术显示,在54个部位中的42个(78%),软骨变化相同;在其他12个部位,标准关节镜检查显示的变化比针式关节镜检查高1级。针式关节镜检查和标准关节镜检查均显示滑膜有51个可评估部位。在标准关节镜检查判定为异常的34个区域中,针式关节镜检查判定24个(71%)异常;两种技术均判定17个区域正常。在滑膜的51个区域中,两种技术在27个(53%)区域给出相同的宏观评分,在其他16个区域中,除1个区域外,标准关节镜检查的分级均更高。
这些初步数据表明,在膝关节OA中,针式关节镜检查能够:1)准确检测半月板异常;2)检测软骨异常,但可能低估其严重程度;3)检测大多数滑膜异常,但也常常低估其严重程度。针式关节镜检查是评估膝关节OA的一种潜在有价值的风湿病学工具。