Elefteriades J A, Tolis G, Levi E, Mills L K, Zaret B L
Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Nov 1;22(5):1411-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90551-b.
The present study evaluated our experience with coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.
Despite the ominous prognosis of advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy, coronary artery bypass grafting in this setting remains controversial because of concerns over operative risk and lack of functional or survival benefit.
We analyzed the data of 83 consecutive patients (69 men, 14 women, aged 42 to 83 years [mean 66.8]) with a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 30% who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (without aneurysmectomy, valve replacement or other open heart procedures) performed by one surgeon during a 6-year period. The ejection fraction ranged from 10% to 30% (mean 24.6%). Preoperatively, 49% of patients had angina, 52% had congestive heart failure (17% with pulmonary edema) and 30% manifested significant ventricular arrhythmia. The mean number of grafts was 2.7/patient. The internal mammary artery was used in 82% of grafts to the left anterior descending coronary artery. The intraaortic balloon pump was required therapeutically (for angina or pump failure) in 19% of patients and was prophylactically placed preoperatively in another 43% of patients.
The hospital mortality rate was 8.4% (7 of 83). The mortality rate was 3.3% (2 of 61) in those patients who did not require admission to an intensive care unit immediately before operation. Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class improved postoperatively by 1.9 categories and New York Heart Association congestive heart failure class by 1 category. Left ventricular ejection fraction (assessed postoperatively in 68 of 76 hospital survivors) improved from 24.6% preoperatively to 33.2% postoperatively (36% increase) (p < 0.001). At 1 and 3 years, respectively, all-cause survival was 87% and 80% and freedom from cardiac death was 89.8% and 84.5%.
In patients with coronary artery disease and advanced ventricular dysfunction: 1) coronary artery bypass grafting can be performed relatively safely, 2) good medium-term survival is attained, 3) improvement in left ventricular function can be documented objectively after bypass grafting, 4) quality of life is improved (as reflected by improvement in anginal and congestive heart failure status), and 5) the internal mammary artery can safely be used as a conduit. The use of coronary artery bypass grafting is encouraged for this group of patients and may provide a viable alternative to transplantation in selected patients.
本研究评估了我们在严重左心室功能不全患者中进行冠状动脉旁路移植术的经验。
尽管晚期缺血性心肌病预后不佳,但由于对手术风险的担忧以及缺乏功能或生存获益,在这种情况下进行冠状动脉旁路移植术仍存在争议。
我们分析了83例连续患者(69例男性,14例女性,年龄42至83岁[平均66.8岁])的数据,这些患者左心室射血分数≤30%,在6年期间由一名外科医生进行了单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术(未进行动脉瘤切除术、瓣膜置换或其他心脏直视手术)。射血分数范围为10%至30%(平均24.6%)。术前,49%的患者有胸痛,52%有充血性心力衰竭(17%有肺水肿),30%有明显的室性心律失常。平均每位患者的移植血管数为2.7支。82%的左前降支冠状动脉移植使用了乳内动脉。19%的患者术中需要使用主动脉内球囊反搏(用于治疗胸痛或泵衰竭),另外43%的患者术前预防性放置了主动脉内球囊反搏。
医院死亡率为8.4%(83例中的7例)。术前无需立即入住重症监护病房的患者死亡率为3.3%(61例中的2例)。加拿大心血管学会心绞痛分级术后改善了1.9级,纽约心脏协会充血性心力衰竭分级改善了1级。76例医院幸存者中有68例术后评估了左心室射血分数,其从术前的24.6%提高到术后的33.2%(提高了36%)(p<0.001)。1年和3年时,全因生存率分别为87%和80%,无心脏死亡生存率分别为89.8%和84.5%。
在患有冠状动脉疾病和晚期心室功能不全的患者中:1)冠状动脉旁路移植术可以相对安全地进行;2)可获得良好的中期生存率;3)旁路移植术后可客观记录左心室功能改善;4)生活质量得到改善(如胸痛和充血性心力衰竭状况的改善所示);5)乳内动脉可安全用作移植血管。对于这组患者,鼓励使用冠状动脉旁路移植术,并且在某些患者中可能是移植的可行替代方案。