Stanco L M, Rabello Y, Medearis A L, Paul R H
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles.
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Dec;82(6):999-1003.
To determine whether a decreased incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests (NSTs) in antepartum testing was attributable to the addition of fetal movement detection to the standard NST.
Monitors with standard fetal heart rate recording capabilities were used, as were new monitors producing a Doppler-detected recording of fetal movement (NST-fetal movement). Cross-sectional retrospective analysis of NST results was carried out by chi 2.
Comparison of the 10-month period before fetal movement detection to the 10 months including NST-fetal movement monitoring showed a significant decrease in nonreactive NSTs from 5.7% to 3.3% (chi 2 = 61.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-0.98). This reduction in nonreactive tests disappeared (3.3% to 5.1%) when the NST-fetal movement-capable monitors were no longer available (chi 2 = 24.2, 95% CI 1.01-1.03).
Nonreactive NSTs decreased by 58% with the introduction of fetal movement monitoring in our antepartum testing center and increased when the NST-fetal movement-capable monitors were removed. A reduced incidence of nonreactive NSTs associated with NST-Doppler-detected fetal movements should effect a savings in both time and resources.
确定产前检查中无反应型无应激试验(NST)发生率的降低是否归因于在标准NST中增加了胎动检测。
使用具有标准胎儿心率记录功能的监护仪,以及能够产生经多普勒检测的胎动记录的新型监护仪(NST-胎动)。通过卡方检验对NST结果进行横断面回顾性分析。
将胎动检测前的10个月与包括NST-胎动监测的10个月进行比较,无反应型NST从5.7%显著降至3.3%(卡方=61.7,95%置信区间[CI]0.97-0.98)。当不再使用具备NST-胎动功能的监护仪时,无反应型试验的这种降低消失了(从3.3%升至5.1%)(卡方=24.2,95%CI 1.01-1.03)。
在我们的产前检查中心,引入胎动监测后无反应型NST降低了58%,而移除具备NST-胎动功能的监护仪后无反应型NST增加了。与NST-多普勒检测到的胎动相关的无反应型NST发生率降低应能节省时间和资源。