Field R W, Kross B C, Vust L J
Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.
Risk Anal. 1993 Aug;13(4):441-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00744.x.
Although radon exposure has been identified as the second leading cause of lung cancer, fewer than 6% of U.S. homeowners test their homes for radon. This report examines participants' follow-up radon testing behavior subsequent to receiving an initial screening radon level greater than 20 pCi/L. Sixty-two participants in the Iowa State-Wide Rural Radon Screening Survey who had radon screening measurements over 20 pCi/L were questioned by phone survey 3 months after receipt of their radon screening result to assess: whether participants were aware of radon's health risk; if participants recalled the radon screening results; how participants perceived the relative health risk of radon and whether participants planned follow-up radon testing. Only 19% of the respondents specifically identified lung cancer as the possible adverse health outcome of high radon exposure, and the majority of participants underestimated the health risks high radon levels pose when compared to cigarettes and x-rays. In addition, less than one third (29%) of the participants actually remembered their radon screening level within 10 pCi/L 3 months after receiving their screening results. Only 53% of the individuals correctly interpreted their screening radon level as being in the high range, and only 39% of the participants planned follow-up radon measurements. Receipt of radon screening test results indicating high radon levels was not an adequate motivational factor in itself to stimulate further radon assessment or mitigation. Our findings suggest that free radon screening will not result in a dramatic increase in subsequent homeowner initiated remediation or further recommended radon testing.
尽管已确认氡暴露是肺癌的第二大主要病因,但在美国,对房屋进行氡检测的房主不到6%。本报告研究了参与者在初次筛查氡水平大于20皮居里/升后进行的后续氡检测行为。爱荷华州全州农村氡筛查调查中有62名参与者的氡筛查测量值超过20皮居里/升,在收到氡筛查结果3个月后,通过电话调查询问他们,以评估:参与者是否知晓氡对健康的风险;参与者是否记得氡筛查结果;参与者如何看待氡的相对健康风险;以及参与者是否计划进行后续氡检测。只有19%的受访者明确指出肺癌是高氡暴露可能导致的不良健康后果,与香烟和X射线相比,大多数参与者低估了高氡水平带来的健康风险。此外,不到三分之一(29%)的参与者在收到筛查结果3个月后,实际能在10皮居里/升范围内记住自己的氡筛查水平。只有53%的人正确将其筛查氡水平解读为处于高范围,只有39%的参与者计划进行后续氡测量。收到表明高氡水平的氡筛查检测结果本身并非促使进一步进行氡评估或缓解的充分动机因素。我们的研究结果表明,免费的氡筛查不会导致后续房主主动进行补救或进一步建议的氡检测大幅增加。