Weinstein N D, Klotz M L, Sandman P M
Department of Human Ecology, Cook College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903.
Am J Public Health. 1988 Jul;78(7):796-800. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.7.796.
Survey data were obtained from a random sample of 657 homeowners in New Jersey and also from 141 homeowners who had already monitored their homes for radon. People who had not tested tended to believe that they were less at risk than their neighbors, and they interpreted ambiguous predictors of home radon levels in ways that supported their beliefs of below-average risk. Residents who had already tested their homes were relatively accurate about the probability of health effects. In both groups less than half of those who knew that radon can cause lung cancer were willing to admit that it would be serious if they suffered health effects from this source. The optimistic biases of the public may hamper attempts to encourage home radon monitoring and to promote appropriate mitigation measures in homes with elevated radon concentrations.
调查数据来自新泽西州657名房主的随机样本,以及141名已经对自家进行氡监测的房主。未进行检测的人往往认为自己比邻居面临的风险更低,并且他们以支持自己低于平均风险信念的方式来解读家庭氡水平的模糊预测指标。已经检测过自家的居民对健康影响概率的判断相对准确。在两组中,知道氡会导致肺癌的人中,不到一半愿意承认如果他们因这种来源而受到健康影响会很严重。公众的乐观偏见可能会阻碍鼓励家庭进行氡监测以及在氡浓度升高的家庭中推广适当缓解措施的努力。