Malchau H, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L
Department of Orthopedics, University of Göteborg, Sweden.
Acta Orthop Scand. 1993 Oct;64(5):497-506. doi: 10.3109/17453679308993679.
A prospective, national multi-center study of all reoperations after total hip replacement (THR) was started by the Swedish Orthopedic Association in 1979. The material comprises all THR performed in Sweden, presently more than 10,000 yearly or 130 THR per 100,000 inhabitants; uncemented implants have been used in less than 2 percent. The main reasons for revision have been aseptic loosening 79 percent, infection 10 percent, technical error 6 percent, and dislocation 2 percent. The cumulative rate of revision for deep infection has dropped from 0.9 percent to < 0.5 percent for implants inserted 1979 and 1983, respectively. With the Charnley prosthesis as the gold, standard the performance of other prostheses was analyzed. Improved cementation techniques and anti-infection measures have continuously reduced the revision risk. The register demonstrates that the average orthopedic surgeon cannot match the results achieved by experts. However, the vast majority of THR, worldwide, are not performed by experts. Quality-assurance in this sector of orthopedics demands a continuous analysis of the outcome of these operations.
1979年,瑞典骨科协会启动了一项针对全髋关节置换术(THR)后所有再次手术的前瞻性全国多中心研究。该材料涵盖了在瑞典进行的所有全髋关节置换术,目前每年超过10000例,即每10万居民中有130例全髋关节置换术;非骨水泥型植入物的使用比例不到2%。翻修的主要原因是无菌性松动占79%,感染占10%,技术失误占6%,脱位占2%。1979年和1983年分别植入的植入物,深部感染的累积翻修率已从0.9%降至<0.5%。以Charnley假体作为金标准,分析了其他假体的性能。改进的骨水泥技术和抗感染措施不断降低了翻修风险。该登记册表明,普通骨科医生无法达到专家所取得的结果。然而,在全球范围内,绝大多数全髋关节置换术并非由专家实施。骨科这一领域的质量保证需要对这些手术的结果进行持续分析。