Paulson W D, Gadallah M F
Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Medical Center, Shreveport 71130.
Am J Med Sci. 1993 Nov;306(5):295-300. doi: 10.1097/00000441-199311000-00004.
In diabetic ketoacidosis, a mixed acid-base disorder is suggested when the anion gap increase (delta AG) does not equal the bicarbonate decrease (delta HCO3), or when the delta AG/delta HCO3 ratio does not equal 1.0. It is widely assumed that delta AG/delta HCO3 is significantly different from 1.0 when it is less than 0.8 or greater than 1.2. The validity of these ratio limits were examined by analyzing a normal control group of 68 subjects and 27 diabetic ketoacidosis admissions that had no evidence of mixed disorders. In the 27 ketoacidosis admissions, regression analysis showed that delta AG was predicted to equal delta HCO3, as expected in pure anion gap acidosis: delta AG = 1.0 delta HCO3 (r = 0.744, p < 0.001). It was found that delta AG is significantly different from delta HCO3 when they differ by more than 8 mEq/L, and equivalently, delta AG/delta HCO3 is significantly different from 1.0 when it is less than (1.0 - 8/delta HCO3) or greater than (1.0 + 8/delta HCO3). These criteria from regression analysis suggested that 4% of the 27 pure anion gap acidoses, and 3% of the control group, had mixed disorders. In contrast, the ratio limits of 0.8 and 1.2 suggested 56% of the pure anion gap acidoses, and 94% of the control group, had mixed disorders. It was concluded that mixed disorders are overdiagnosed by the ratio limits of 0.8 and 1.2. Mixed disorders are more accurately detected by noting whether delta AG and delta HCO3 differ by more than 8 mEq/L.
在糖尿病酮症酸中毒中,当阴离子间隙增加量(ΔAG)不等于碳酸氢盐减少量(ΔHCO₃),或者当ΔAG/ΔHCO₃比值不等于1.0时,提示存在混合性酸碱紊乱。人们普遍认为,当ΔAG/ΔHCO₃小于0.8或大于1.2时,其与1.0存在显著差异。通过分析68名正常对照组受试者以及27例无混合性紊乱证据的糖尿病酮症酸中毒入院病例,对这些比值界限的有效性进行了检验。在这27例酮症酸中毒入院病例中,回归分析显示,正如在单纯阴离子间隙酸中毒中所预期的那样,ΔAG预计等于ΔHCO₃:ΔAG = 1.0ΔHCO₃(r = 0.744,p < 0.001)。研究发现,当ΔAG与ΔHCO₃相差超过8 mEq/L时,二者存在显著差异,同样,当ΔAG/ΔHCO₃小于(1.0 - 8/ΔHCO₃)或大于(1.0 + 8/ΔHCO₃)时,其与1.0存在显著差异。回归分析得出的这些标准表明,在这27例单纯阴离子间隙酸中毒病例中,4%存在混合性紊乱,对照组中这一比例为3%。相比之下,0.8和1.2的比值界限提示,56%的单纯阴离子间隙酸中毒病例以及94%的对照组存在混合性紊乱。研究得出结论,采用0.8和1.2的比值界限会过度诊断混合性紊乱。通过留意ΔAG和ΔHCO₃是否相差超过8 mEq/L,能更准确地检测出混合性紊乱。