Suppr超能文献

氨茶碱对因哮喘急性加重而住院的成年人有益吗?

Does aminophylline benefit adults admitted to the hospital for an acute exacerbation of asthma?

作者信息

Huang D, O'Brien R G, Harman E, Aull L, Reents S, Visser J, Shieh G, Hendeles L

机构信息

University of Florida, Gainesville.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1993 Dec 15;119(12):1155-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-12-199312150-00001.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of adding intravenous theophylline (administered as aminophylline) to nebulizations of albuterol and intravenous methylprednisolone in adults hospitalized for acute asthma.

DESIGN

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

SETTING

Inpatient service of a tertiary-care, university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

21 adults (22 to 48 years old)--10 in the aminophylline group and 11 in the placebo group.

INTERVENTIONS

Nebulized albuterol, 2.5 or 5.0 mg every 0.5 to 4 hours; intravenous methylprednisolone, 60 mg every 6 hours; and either individualized doses of aminophylline or placebo for 48 hours.

MEASUREMENTS

Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), the number of "as needed" albuterol nebulizations and total dose, asthma symptom scores, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

At admission from the emergency department, the mean +/- SD baseline FEV1 was 49% +/- 19% of the predicted value in the aminophylline group and 43% +/- 13% of the predicted value in the placebo group. The improvement in FEV1 at 3 hours was greater in the aminophylline group (29% +/- 23% compared with 10% +/- 10% in the placebo group; mean difference, 19 percentage points; 95% CI, 3 to 35 percentage points; P = 0.023). At 48 hours, FEV1 was 75% +/- 19% of the predicted value in the aminophylline group and 58% +/- 15% of the predicted value in the placebo group (mean difference, 17 percentage points; CI, 0.2 to 34.8 percentage points; P = 0.048). Aminophylline-treated patients required fewer nebulizations of albuterol (10.3 +/- 3.8 compared with 16.4 +/- 5.3; mean difference, -6.1; CI, -10.3 to -1.8) and less total dosage (34 +/- 16 mg compared with 70 +/- 34 mg; mean difference, -36 mg; CI, -60.6 to -11.3 mg P = 0.02). No statistical differences were observed in asthma symptom scores or frequency of adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualized doses of intravenous theophylline added to frequent nebulizations of albuterol and intravenous methylprednisolone appear to benefit adults admitted to the hospital with acute asthma and are well tolerated when serum concentrations are maintained in the therapeutic range.

摘要

目的

确定在因急性哮喘住院的成人中,在雾化吸入沙丁胺醇和静脉注射甲泼尼龙的基础上加用静脉注射氨茶碱(以氨茶碱形式给药)的效果。

设计

随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究。

地点

一所三级医疗大学教学医院的住院部。

患者

21名成年人(22至48岁)——氨茶碱组10名,安慰剂组11名。

干预措施

每0.5至4小时雾化吸入沙丁胺醇2.5或5.0毫克;每6小时静脉注射甲泼尼龙60毫克;并给予个体化剂量的氨茶碱或安慰剂,持续48小时。

测量指标

第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、“按需”雾化吸入沙丁胺醇的次数和总剂量、哮喘症状评分及不良反应。

结果

从急诊科入院时,氨茶碱组的平均±标准差基线FEV1为预测值的49%±19%,安慰剂组为预测值的43%±13%。氨茶碱组在3小时时FEV1的改善更大(分别为29%±23%和10%±10%;平均差值为19个百分点;95%可信区间为3至35个百分点;P = 0.023)。在48小时时,氨茶碱组的FEV1为预测值的75%±19%,安慰剂组为58%±15%(平均差值为17个百分点;可信区间为0.2至34.8个百分点;P = 0.048)。接受氨茶碱治疗的患者所需的沙丁胺醇雾化吸入次数更少(分别为10.3±3.8次和16.4±5.3次;平均差值为-6.1;可信区间为-10.3至-1.8),总剂量也更少(分别为34±16毫克和70±34毫克;平均差值为-36毫克;可信区间为-60.6至-11.3毫克;P = 0.02)。在哮喘症状评分或不良反应发生率方面未观察到统计学差异。

结论

在频繁雾化吸入沙丁胺醇和静脉注射甲泼尼龙的基础上加用个体化剂量的静脉注射氨茶碱,似乎对因急性哮喘入院的成年人有益,且当血清浓度维持在治疗范围内时耐受性良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验