Shiffman S
Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Oct;61(5):732-42. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.61.5.732.
This article focuses on measures used to assess smoking patterns and motives. Self-report typology scales demonstrate a remarkably stable factor structure and good reliability. However, self-monitoring studies suggest that typology scales do not accurately assess smoking patterns and do not provide a good basis for treatment planning. Nevertheless, typology scores are correlated with variables such as smoking rate, craving, and cessation outcomes. These correlations may largely be accounted for by a common underlying factor, here labeled smoking drive, which may serve as a measure of dependence. Finally, the article briefly introduces new methods for assessing smoking patterns using palm-top computers to track smoking and other stimuli in real time. These methods may provide more valid assessment of smoking patterns.
本文着重探讨用于评估吸烟模式和动机的方法。自我报告类型量表显示出显著稳定的因素结构和良好的信度。然而，自我监测研究表明，类型量表不能准确评估吸烟模式，也不能为治疗计划提供良好的基础。尽管如此，类型得分与吸烟率、渴望程度和戒烟结果等变量相关。这些相关性可能在很大程度上由一个共同的潜在因素（这里称为吸烟驱力）来解释，它可能作为一种依赖程度的衡量指标。最后，本文简要介绍了使用掌上电脑实时追踪吸烟及其他刺激因素来评估吸烟模式的新方法。这些方法可能会对吸烟模式提供更有效的评估。
