Klein A L, Cohen G I, Pietrolungo J F, White R D, Bailey A, Pearce G L, Stewart W J, Salcedo E E
Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Dec;22(7):1935-43. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90782-v.
The purpose of this study was to test the utility of measuring respiratory variation in pulmonary venous flow by transesophageal echocardiography.
Respiratory variation of atrioventricular and central venous flow velocities by Doppler echocardiography has been used to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
We performed pulsed wave Doppler transesophageal echocardiography of the left or right pulmonary veins in 31 patients with diastolic dysfunction. Fourteen patients had constrictive pericarditis, and 17 had restrictive cardiomyopathy. We measured the pulmonary venous peak systolic and diastolic flow velocities and the systolic/diastolic flow ratio with transesophageal echocardiography during expiration and inspiration. The percent change in Doppler flow velocity from expiration to inspiration (%E) was calculated.
Pulmonary venous peak systolic flow in both inspiration and expiration was greater in constrictive pericarditis than in restrictive cardiomyopathy. The %E for peak systolic flow tended to be higher in constrictive pericarditis (19% vs. 10%, p = 0.09). In contrast, pulmonary venous peak diastolic flow during inspiration was lower in constrictive pericarditis than in restrictive cardiomyopathy. The %E for peak diastolic flow was larger in constrictive pericarditis (29% vs. 16%, p = 0.008). The pulmonary venous systolic/diastolic flow ratio was greater in constrictive pericarditis in both inspiration and expiration. The combination of pulmonary venous systolic/diastolic flow ratio > or = 0.65 in inspiration and a %E for peak diastolic flow > or = 40% correctly classified 86% of patients with constrictive pericarditis.
The relatively larger pulmonary venous systolic/diastolic flow ratio and greater respiratory variation in pulmonary venous systolic, and especially diastolic, flow velocities by transesophageal echocardiography can be useful signs in distinguishing constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.
本研究旨在测试经食管超声心动图测量肺静脉血流呼吸变化的实用性。
通过多普勒超声心动图测量房室和中心静脉血流速度的呼吸变化已被用于区分缩窄性心包炎和限制性心肌病。
我们对31例舒张功能障碍患者进行了左或右肺静脉的脉冲波多普勒经食管超声心动图检查。14例患者患有缩窄性心包炎,17例患有限制性心肌病。我们在呼气和吸气期间用经食管超声心动图测量肺静脉收缩期和舒张期峰值血流速度以及收缩期/舒张期血流比值。计算从呼气到吸气时多普勒血流速度的变化百分比(%E)。
缩窄性心包炎患者吸气和呼气时的肺静脉收缩期峰值血流均高于限制性心肌病患者。缩窄性心包炎患者收缩期峰值血流的%E往往更高(19%对10%,p = 0.09)。相比之下,缩窄性心包炎患者吸气时的肺静脉舒张期峰值血流低于限制性心肌病患者。缩窄性心包炎患者舒张期峰值血流的%E更大(29%对16%,p = 0.008)。缩窄性心包炎患者吸气和呼气时的肺静脉收缩期/舒张期血流比值均更大。吸气时肺静脉收缩期/舒张期血流比值≥0.65且舒张期峰值血流的%E≥40%的组合正确分类了86%的缩窄性心包炎患者。
经食管超声心动图显示,相对较大的肺静脉收缩期/舒张期血流比值以及肺静脉收缩期尤其是舒张期血流速度的较大呼吸变化,可能是区分缩窄性心包炎和限制性心肌病的有用征象。