Lobkovsky E, Moews P C, Liu H, Zhao H, Frere J M, Knox J R
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269-3125.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 1;90(23):11257-61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.23.11257.
The structure of the class C ampC beta-lactamase (cephalosporinase) from Enterobacter cloacae strain P99 has been established by x-ray crystallography to 2-A resolution and compared to a class A beta-lactamase (penicillinase) structure. The binding site for beta-lactam (penicillinase) structure. The binding site for beta-lactam antibiotics is generally more open than that in penicillinases, in agreement with the ability of the class C beta-lactamases to better bind third-generation cephalosporins. Four corresponding catalytic residues (Ser-64/70, Lys-67/73, Lys-315/234, and Tyr-150/Ser-130 in class C/A) lie in equivalent positions within 0.4 A. Significant differences in positions and accessibilities of Arg-349/244 may explain the inability of clavulanate-type inhibitors to effectively inactivate the class C beta-lactamases. Glu-166, required for deacylation of the beta-lactamoyl intermediate in class A penicillinases, has no counterpart in this cephalosporinase; the nearest candidate, Asp-217, is 10 A from the reactive Ser-64. A comparison of overall tertiary folding shows that the cephalosporinase, more than the penicillinase, is broadly similar to the ancestral beta-lactam-inhibited enzymes of bacterial cell wall synthesis. On this basis, it is proposed that the cephalosporinase is the older of the two beta-lactamases, and, therefore, that a local refolding in the active site, rather than a simple point mutation, was required for the primordial class C beta-lactamase to evolve to the class A beta-lactamase having an improved ability to catalyze the deacylation step of beta-lactam hydrolysis.
通过X射线晶体学已确定阴沟肠杆菌P99菌株C类AmpCβ-内酰胺酶(头孢菌素酶)的结构,分辨率达2埃,并与A类β-内酰胺酶(青霉素酶)结构进行了比较。β-内酰胺(青霉素酶)结构的结合位点。β-内酰胺抗生素的结合位点通常比青霉素酶中的更开放,这与C类β-内酰胺酶能更好地结合第三代头孢菌素的能力一致。四个相应的催化残基(C类/A类中的Ser-64/70、Lys-67/73、Lys-315/234和Tyr-150/Ser-130)位于0.4埃范围内的等效位置。Arg-349/244的位置和可及性存在显著差异,这可能解释了克拉维酸型抑制剂无法有效使C类β-内酰胺酶失活的原因。A类青霉素酶中β-内酰胺酰基中间体脱酰基所需的Glu-166在这种头孢菌素酶中没有对应物;最接近的候选者Asp-217距离反应性Ser-64有10埃。整体三级折叠的比较表明,头孢菌素酶比青霉素酶更广泛地类似于细菌细胞壁合成中祖先的β-内酰胺抑制酶。在此基础上,有人提出头孢菌素酶是两种β-内酰胺酶中较古老的一种,因此,原始的C类β-内酰胺酶进化为具有更好催化β-内酰胺水解脱酰基步骤能力的A类β-内酰胺酶需要活性位点的局部重折叠,而不是简单的点突变。