Self D J
Department of Humanities in Medicine, College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843.
Theor Med. 1993 Sep;14(3):221-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00995164.
This study investigates the three major educational philosophies behind the medical humanities programs in the United States. It summarizes the characteristics of the Cultural Transmission Approach, the Affective Developmental Approach, and the Cognitive Developmental Approach. A questionnaire was sent to 415 teachers of medical humanities asking for their perceptions of the amount of time and effort devoted by their programs to these three philosophical approaches. The 234 responses constituted a 54.6% return. The approximately 80:20 gender ratio of males to females and other demographic data on age and educational background were consistent with other studies of the field of medical humanities. Reflections on the results in Table II indicate that some changes need to take place in the teaching of the medical humanities if the perceived ideal is to be achieved. In order for the current teachers of the medical humanities to think that the appropriate philosophies behind the teaching of the medical humanities are being implemented as they should be, much less time and effort need to be devoted to the Cultural Transmission Approach. With no other published reports on the educational philosophies behind the medical humanities programs, this study created a new knowledge base about this relatively young and rapidly emerging field.
本研究调查了美国医学人文学科项目背后的三大主要教育理念。它总结了文化传递法、情感发展法和认知发展法的特点。向415位医学人文学科教师发放了一份问卷,询问他们对各自项目在这三种哲学方法上投入的时间和精力的看法。234份回复的回收率为54.6%。男性与女性约为80:20的性别比例以及关于年龄和教育背景的其他人口统计数据与医学人文学科领域的其他研究一致。对表二结果的思考表明,如果要实现所认为的理想状态,医学人文学科的教学需要进行一些变革。为了让当前的医学人文学科教师认为医学人文学科教学背后的适当理念正在得到应有的实施,需要在文化传递法上投入的时间和精力要少得多。由于没有其他关于医学人文学科项目背后教育理念的已发表报告,本研究为这个相对年轻且迅速兴起的领域创建了一个新的知识库。