Gadomski A M, Khallaf N, el Ansary S, Black R E
Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland.
Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71(5):523-7.
In a baseline study for training purposes, two indicators of acute respiratory infections (the respiratory rate (RR) and chest indrawing) were assessed by Ministry of Health physicians in Egypt using a WHO test videotape. Chest indrawing, as defined by the WHO Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) programme, was not widely recognized by current health personnel. Viewing a WHO training videotape led to significantly more correct assessments of chest indrawing compared with a group that had not viewed this videotape. The accuracy of using a timer versus a watch, and a 30-second versus 60-second counting interval was also evaluated. Rates counted over 60 seconds were more accurate than 30-second counts although the difference between them was not clinically significant. Counting of rates using timers with audible cues was comparable to using watches with second hands. Careful training of primary health workers in the assessment of RR and chest indrawing is essential if these clinical findings are to be used as reliable indicators in pneumonia treatment algorithms.
在一项用于培训目的的基线研究中,埃及卫生部的医生使用世界卫生组织(WHO)的测试录像带对急性呼吸道感染的两项指标(呼吸频率(RR)和胸凹陷)进行了评估。按照WHO急性呼吸道感染(ARI)项目的定义,胸凹陷并未被当前的卫生人员广泛认识。与未观看该录像带的小组相比,观看WHO培训录像带能显著提高对胸凹陷评估的正确性。同时还评估了使用定时器与手表,以及30秒与60秒计数间隔的准确性。尽管60秒计数与30秒计数之间的差异在临床上不显著,但60秒计数的结果更准确。使用带有声音提示的定时器计数与使用带秒针的手表计数相当。如果要将这些临床发现用作肺炎治疗方案中的可靠指标,对初级卫生工作者进行RR和胸凹陷评估的仔细培训至关重要。