Bauwens J E, Clark A M, Stamm W E
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Nov;31(11):3023-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.3023-3027.1993.
We evaluated a prototype polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay for Chlamydia trachomatis developed by Roche Molecular Systems to detect endocervical infection in women. Of 587 endocervical samples obtained from women attending the Harborview Medical Center sexually transmitted diseases clinic, 58 (10%) were positive for C. trachomatis by cell culture. Compared with culture, the PCR method had a sensitivity of 88% (51 of 58) and a specificity of 99.2% (525 of 529). The positive and negative predictive values were 92.7% (51 of 55) and 98.7% (525 of 532), respectively. After resolution of discrepant results whereby true positives were considered to be either culture-positive patients (58 patients) or culture-negative patients positive upon PCR analysis using both plasmid- and major outer membrane protein-based primers (4 patients), the resolved sensitivities of the PCR and culture were 89 and 93%, respectively. We subsequently performed a second analysis of 362 women, comparing the proposed commercial PCR assay from Roche Molecular Systems with chlamydia cultures. Thirty (8%) women were infected with C. trachomatis. Compared with culture, the assay had a sensitivity of 60% (18 of 30) and a specificity of 99% (328 of 332). Repeat PCR assay done 2 to 5 days later subsequently yielded positive results for 7 of 11 PCR-negative samples from culture-positive women. We conclude that the Roche Molecular Systems PCR assay provides highly specific results compared with culture in a high-risk population of women. Further study is needed, however, to more clearly define the sensitivity of the PCR assay in detecting endocervical C. trachomatis infection in women and to identify factors that may compromise sensitivity.
我们评估了罗氏分子系统公司开发的一种基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的沙眼衣原体检测方法的原型,用于检测女性宫颈内膜感染。在从哈博维尤医疗中心性传播疾病诊所就诊的女性中获取的587份宫颈内膜样本中,通过细胞培养,58份(10%)沙眼衣原体呈阳性。与培养法相比,PCR方法的敏感性为88%(58份中的51份),特异性为99.2%(529份中的525份)。阳性和阴性预测值分别为92.7%(55份中的51份)和98.7%(532份中的525份)。在解决了不一致结果后,即真正的阳性被认为是培养阳性患者(58例患者)或使用基于质粒和主要外膜蛋白的引物进行PCR分析后培养阴性但呈阳性的患者(4例患者),PCR和培养的解决后敏感性分别为89%和93%。我们随后对362名女性进行了第二次分析,将罗氏分子系统公司提议的商业PCR检测方法与衣原体培养法进行比较。30名(8%)女性感染了沙眼衣原体。与培养法相比,该检测方法的敏感性为60%(30份中的18份),特异性为99%(332份中的328份)。在2至5天后对11份培养阳性女性的PCR阴性样本进行重复PCR检测,随后其中7份结果呈阳性。我们得出结论,在高危女性人群中,与培养法相比,罗氏分子系统公司的PCR检测方法能提供高度特异的结果。然而,需要进一步研究以更明确地界定PCR检测方法在检测女性宫颈内膜沙眼衣原体感染方面的敏感性,并确定可能影响敏感性的因素。