Lee K H, Hui K P, Tan W C
Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Singapore Med J. 1993 Jun;34(3):245-6.
Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and thrombocytopenia are well-known complications of sepsis, but the relationship between these coagulation abnormalities and outcome have not been well documented. We studied the incidence of thrombocytopenia and DIC in our Medical Intensive Care Unit, and evaluated their usefulness as prognostic risk factors for mortality. Platelet count was not found to be an independent risk factor associated with overall mortality in the 107 patients studied. In the sub-group of 53 patients with sepsis, 22 (42%) developed DIC, 31 (58%) developed thrombocytopenia (< 150,000 x 10(9)/L) and 27 (51%) died. Thrombocytopenia was associated with presence of DIC (p = 0.003), but not with the type of infecting organism. The platelet count in non-survivors (mean +/- sem, 97 +/- 18 x 10(9)/L) was significantly lower than survivors (194 +/- 27 x 10(9)/L, p < 0.005). Multiple regression analysis showed that thrombocytopenia was a risk factor for mortality, independent of the APACHE II score. The presence of DIC surprisingly was not an independent risk factor. We conclude that DIC and thrombocytopenia are common in our adult Medical Intensive Care patients with sepsis, but only the latter is a prognostic factor in addition to the APACHE II score. The incidence of DIC in our patients (mainly Chinese) seems to be more than that of 10 to 20% reported in other series of Caucasian patients. We would, therefore, like to emphasise the importance of platelet count as an prognostic risk factor in sepsis.
弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)和血小板减少是脓毒症众所周知的并发症,但这些凝血异常与预后之间的关系尚未得到充分记录。我们研究了我院重症监护病房中血小板减少和DIC的发生率,并评估了它们作为死亡预后危险因素的作用。在研究的107例患者中,血小板计数并非与总体死亡率相关的独立危险因素。在53例脓毒症患者亚组中,22例(42%)发生了DIC,31例(58%)出现了血小板减少(<150,000×10⁹/L),27例(51%)死亡。血小板减少与DIC的存在相关(p = 0.003),但与感染病原体类型无关。非存活者的血小板计数(均值±标准误,97±18×10⁹/L)显著低于存活者(194±27×10⁹/L,p < 0.005)。多元回归分析显示,血小板减少是死亡的危险因素,独立于急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)评分。令人惊讶的是,DIC的存在并非独立危险因素。我们得出结论,DIC和血小板减少在我院成年脓毒症重症监护患者中很常见,但只有后者是除APACHE II评分外的预后因素。我院患者(主要为中国人)中DIC发生率似乎高于其他系列白种人患者报道的10%至20%。因此,我们想强调血小板计数作为脓毒症预后危险因素的重要性。