Cohen M M, Duncan P G, DeBoer D P, Tweed W A
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, North York, Ontario, Canada.
Anesth Analg. 1994 Jan;78(1):7-16. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199401000-00004.
Most studies of postoperative nausea and vomiting have concentrated on single etiologic factors and have not detailed the method of assessing these symptoms. This study used postoperative interview data from patients at four teaching hospitals during 1988-89, to determine 1) risk factors for nausea/vomiting, 2) whether the type of surgery affected the rate of nausea/vomiting among female patients, 3) whether differences in rates across hospitals were due to differences in patient case-mix, and 4) whether there were differences in the rate of nausea/vomiting among the patients of individual anesthesiologists. Research nurses performed 16,000 interviews (59% of all inpatients) from a closed-question standardized format. With a multiple logistic regression that controlled simultaneously for all risk factors, factors associated with increased risk for nausea/vomiting for all patients included younger age, female, lower physical status score, no preoperative medical conditions, nonsmokers, elective procedures, longer duration of anesthesia, inhaled anesthetics, use of intraoperative opioids, and gynecologic or ophthalmologic operations. Among women, risk factors were similar, with minor gynecologic surgery associated with increased risk (relative odds = 2.30). We found marked variations in the rate of nausea/vomiting across hospitals (range, 39% to 73%), and these variations were not explained by the case-mix of patients. The rate of nausea/vomiting varied substantially across anesthesiologists in each hospital and the differences were not explained by differences in the patients they managed. Thus in the time period immediately preceding the introduction of newer antiemetic drugs, we found that the rates of this common problem were persistently high as perceived from the patients' point of view.
大多数关于术后恶心呕吐的研究都集中在单一病因因素上,并未详细说明评估这些症状的方法。本研究使用了1988 - 1989年期间四家教学医院患者的术后访谈数据,以确定:1)恶心/呕吐的危险因素;2)手术类型是否影响女性患者的恶心/呕吐发生率;3)各医院发生率的差异是否归因于患者病例组合的差异;4)个体麻醉医生的患者中恶心/呕吐发生率是否存在差异。研究护士采用封闭式标准化格式进行了16000次访谈(占所有住院患者的59%)。通过同时控制所有危险因素的多元逻辑回归分析,所有患者中与恶心/呕吐风险增加相关的因素包括年龄较小、女性、身体状况评分较低、术前无疾病、不吸烟、择期手术、麻醉时间较长、吸入麻醉剂、术中使用阿片类药物以及妇科或眼科手术。在女性中,危险因素相似,小妇科手术风险增加(相对比值 = 2.30)。我们发现各医院恶心/呕吐发生率存在显著差异(范围为39%至73%),且这些差异无法用患者的病例组合来解释。每家医院不同麻醉医生的患者恶心/呕吐发生率差异很大,且这些差异无法用他们所管理患者的差异来解释。因此,在新型止吐药物引入之前的这段时间,我们发现从患者角度来看,这个常见问题的发生率一直居高不下。