• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口语理解过程中对词义的获取:句子语义语境的影响。

Access to word meanings during spoken language comprehension: effects of sentential semantic context.

作者信息

Moss H E, Marslen-Wilson W D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Birkbeck College, London, England.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Nov;19(6):1254-76. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.6.1254.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.19.6.1254
PMID:8270887
Abstract

In 3 cross-modal priming experiments, we investigated whether access to a word's meaning is affected by the semantic context in which it is heard or is exhaustive and context-independent. We probed access of nonassociated semantic properties and normatively associated words before and after prime offset. Whereas associated targets were primed context-independently, access to semantic property targets was affected by the sentential context. Semantic property targets showed greater priming in a sentence biasing to a specific semantic property than in a neutral condition, even when this bias made the target property irrelevant rather than relevant. These results cannot be accounted for by current exhaustive access or context-dependency theories of lexical access.

摘要

在3个跨模态启动实验中,我们研究了对一个单词意义的通达是受其被听到时的语义语境影响,还是全面且与语境无关的。我们在启动刺激消失前后探测了非关联语义属性和规范关联单词的通达情况。虽然关联目标在语境独立的情况下被启动,但对语义属性目标的通达受句子语境的影响。语义属性目标在偏向特定语义属性的句子中比在中性条件下表现出更大的启动效应,即使这种偏向使目标属性不相关而非相关。当前关于词汇通达的全面通达或语境依赖理论无法解释这些结果。

相似文献

1
Access to word meanings during spoken language comprehension: effects of sentential semantic context.口语理解过程中对词义的获取:句子语义语境的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Nov;19(6):1254-76. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.6.1254.
2
Morphosemantic activation of opaque Chinese words in sentence comprehension.句子理解中不透明汉语词汇的形态语义激活
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 12;15(8):e0236697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236697. eCollection 2020.
3
Word-meaning priming extends beyond homonyms.词意启动不仅限于同形异义词。
Cognition. 2022 Sep;226:105175. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105175. Epub 2022 May 27.
4
Hemispheric contributions to lexical ambiguity resolution in a discourse context: evidence from individuals with unilateral left and right hemisphere lesions.话语语境中半球对词汇歧义消解的作用:来自单侧左、右半球损伤个体的证据。
Brain Cogn. 2005 Feb;57(1):70-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.023.
5
The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing.句子语义语境在口语单词处理中的作用轨迹。
Cognition. 1989 Jun;32(1):25-64. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90013-9.
6
Effects of sentence context on lexical ambiguity resolution in patients with schizophrenia.句子语境对精神分裂症患者词汇歧义消解的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Mar;47(4):1079-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.031. Epub 2009 Jan 3.
7
Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities.听众和读者会跨模态归纳他们对词义的体验。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Oct;44(10):1533-1561. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000532. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
8
Accessing and selecting word meaning in autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍中词汇意义的获取和选择。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;52(9):964-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02393.x. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
9
Hemispheric differences in context sensitivity during lexical ambiguity resolution.词汇歧义消解过程中上下文敏感性的半球差异。
Brain Lang. 1998 Dec;65(3):361-94. doi: 10.1006/brln.1998.1998.
10
The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization.语义多样性在词汇组织中的作用。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Jun;66(2):115-24. doi: 10.1037/a0026727.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal speech cue perception in listeners with cochlear implants depends on the time between those cues and previous sound energy.人工耳蜗使用者对时间语音线索的感知取决于这些线索与先前声音能量之间的时间间隔。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Oct 1;156(4):2851-2859. doi: 10.1121/10.0029020.
2
Knowing what you need to know in advance: The neural processes underpinning flexible semantic retrieval of thematic and taxonomic relations.提前了解所需知识:支持主题和分类关系灵活语义检索的神经过程。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117405. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117405. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
3
The Relation between Alpha/Beta Oscillations and the Encoding of Sentence induced Contextual Information.
α/β 振荡与句子诱发语境信息编码之间的关系。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):20255. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56600-x.
4
Neural dynamics of semantic composition.语义组合的神经动力学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 15;116(42):21318-21327. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903402116. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
5
Structure, form, and meaning in the mental lexicon: evidence from Arabic.心理词库中的结构、形式和意义:来自阿拉伯语的证据。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Aug 6;30(8):955-992. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1048258. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
6
Semantic priming of familiar songs.熟悉歌曲的语义启动。
Mem Cognit. 2012 May;40(4):579-93. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0175-z.
7
On the nature of semantic constraints on lexical access.论词汇通达中语义限制的本质。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2012 Jun;41(3):195-214. doi: 10.1007/s10936-011-9184-0.
8
An eye-movement-contingent probe paradigm.一种眼动 contingent 探测范式。 (注: contingent 这个词在专业领域可能有特定含义,这里直接保留英文以便读者理解专业语境,若结合上下文准确翻译可能是“依随的”等更合适的表述,但仅按要求不添加解释直接翻译就是这样)
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Sep;10(3):661-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03196529.
9
Incidental formation of episodic associations: the importance of sentential context.偶发性情景联想的形成:句子语境的重要性。
Mem Cognit. 2003 Mar;31(2):306-16. doi: 10.3758/bf03194389.
10
Resolution of lexical ambiguity by emotional tone of voice.通过语音语调解决词汇歧义。
Mem Cognit. 2002 Jun;30(4):583-93. doi: 10.3758/bf03194959.