Sasso R, Doherty B J, Crawford M J, Heggeness M H
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Oct 15;18(14):1950-3. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199310001-00004.
Direct anterior screw fixation of odontoid fractures has become more prevalent clinically. No biomechanical study, however, has determined whether one or two screws should be used. This study measured the stability of the odontoid process after fracture and internal fixation with one or two screws. Internal fixation of Type II odontoid fractures did not restore the original stability of the intact specimen, direct internal fixation with one or two screws provided 50% of the stability of the unfractured odontoid, and no significant differences between the one- and two-screw technique was found under loading to failure, although the two-screw technique provided increased stiffness in extension loading.
齿状突骨折的直接前路螺钉固定在临床上已变得更为普遍。然而,尚无生物力学研究确定应使用一枚还是两枚螺钉。本研究测量了骨折并分别用一枚或两枚螺钉内固定后齿状突的稳定性。II型齿状突骨折的内固定未能恢复完整标本的原始稳定性,用一枚或两枚螺钉直接内固定提供了完整齿状突稳定性的50%,在直至破坏的加载过程中,一枚螺钉技术和两枚螺钉技术之间未发现显著差异,尽管两枚螺钉技术在伸展加载时提供了更高的刚度。