• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜阑尾切除术:值得做吗?

Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worth it?

作者信息

Buckley R C, Hall T J, Muakkassa F F, Anglin B, Rhodes R S, Scott-Conner C E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216.

出版信息

Am Surg. 1994 Jan;60(1):30-4.

PMID:8273971
Abstract

Data on all laparoscopic appendectomies (LA) were collected prospectively from June 1990 through July 1992 and compared retrospectively with all open appendectomies (OA) done at the same hospital during the same time period. Laparoscopic appendectomies were performed in 29 patients (ages 15-47, mean 25.3 years) and OA in 77 patients (ages 18-71, mean 31.9 years, P < 0.01). Preoperative findings were similar in the two groups. Acute appendicitis was confirmed in 22 (76%) LA and in 57 (74%) OA; of these, 9/22 (41%) LA and 23/57 (40%) OA were gangrenous or perforated. A normal appendix was removed in seven (24%) LA and in 20 (26%) OA. Three patients (10%) required conversion of LA to an open procedure. Operative time was significantly longer for LA (mean 105 minutes) compared with OA (mean 69 minutes; P < 0.001). Postoperative complications requiring further intervention (wound infection or intraabdominal abscess) occurred in three LA (10%) and in 23 OA (30%, P < 0.05). Wound morbidity as measured by number of wounds left open at surgery or opened for infection was significantly less after LA (14% LA, 39% OA, P < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter after LA (mean 4.2 days) compared with OA (mean 6.3 days; P < 0.05). Hospital charges and professional fees were not significantly different between the two groups. In selected patients, LA is a safe, effective alternative to OA, with fewer complications and shorter hospital stay. In addition, hospital charges are similar, making an investment of more time in the operating yield an outcome equal or superior to OA.

摘要

1990年6月至1992年7月期间前瞻性收集了所有腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)的数据,并与同期在同一家医院进行的所有开腹阑尾切除术(OA)进行回顾性比较。29例患者接受了腹腔镜阑尾切除术(年龄15 - 47岁,平均25.3岁),77例患者接受了开腹阑尾切除术(年龄18 - 71岁,平均31.9岁,P < 0.01)。两组术前检查结果相似。22例(76%)腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者和57例(74%)开腹阑尾切除术患者确诊为急性阑尾炎;其中,9/22(41%)腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者和23/57(40%)开腹阑尾切除术患者阑尾坏疽或穿孔。7例(24%)腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者和20例(26%)开腹阑尾切除术患者切除的阑尾正常。3例(10%)患者需要将腹腔镜阑尾切除术转为开腹手术。与开腹阑尾切除术(平均69分钟;P < 0.001)相比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术的手术时间明显更长(平均105分钟)。需要进一步干预的术后并发症(伤口感染或腹腔内脓肿)在3例腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者中发生(10%),在23例开腹阑尾切除术患者中发生(30%,P < 0.05)。以手术时未缝合或因感染而打开的伤口数量衡量的伤口发病率在腹腔镜阑尾切除术后明显更低(腹腔镜阑尾切除术为14%,开腹阑尾切除术为39%,P < 0.001)。与开腹阑尾切除术(平均6.3天;P < 0.05)相比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术后住院时间明显更短(平均4.2天)。两组之间的住院费用和专业费用没有显著差异。对于选定的患者,腹腔镜阑尾切除术是开腹阑尾切除术的一种安全、有效的替代方法,并发症更少,住院时间更短。此外,住院费用相似,在手术中投入更多时间能产生与开腹阑尾切除术相当或更好的结果。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worth it?腹腔镜阑尾切除术:值得做吗?
Am Surg. 1994 Jan;60(1):30-4.
2
Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.腹腔镜、开放及中转开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):660-2. doi: 10.1007/s004640020072. Epub 2001 May 14.
3
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
4
Effectiveness of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis.腹腔镜手术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效
Osaka City Med J. 2007 Jun;53(1):1-8.
5
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
6
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:以色列一家医院的回顾性比较结果
Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 Feb;4(2):91-4.
7
Laparoscopic appendectomy for simple and perforated appendicitis in children: the procedure of choice?小儿单纯性及穿孔性阑尾炎的腹腔镜阑尾切除术:是首选术式吗?
J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Nov;35(11):1582-5. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.18319.
8
Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy: retrospective assessment of 200 patients.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术:200例患者的回顾性评估
Can J Surg. 1995 Apr;38(2):178-82.
9
[Laparoscopic appendectomy after the learning curve].[学习曲线后的腹腔镜阑尾切除术]
Cir Pediatr. 2008 Jul;21(3):167-72.
10
Laparoscopic appendectomy is feasible for the complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术对于复杂性阑尾炎是可行的。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000 Dec;10(6):364-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of two methods: Clipping and suturing in laparoscopic appendectomy.两种方法的比较:腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的夹闭与缝合
Surg Open Sci. 2024 May 3;19:162-165. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.007. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Open appendectomy for pediatric ruptured appendicitis: a historical clinical review of the prophylaxis of wound infection and postoperative intra-abdominal abscess.小儿阑尾穿孔行开腹阑尾切除术:预防伤口感染和术后腹腔脓肿的历史临床回顾。
Can J Surg. 2013 Jun;56(3):E7-E12. doi: 10.1503/cjs.001912.
3
Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is more favorable for patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and those with complicated appendicitis: a nationwide population-based study.
腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎对合并症患者、老年患者和复杂性阑尾炎患者更为有利:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Sep;25(9):2932-42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1645-x. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
4
Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies.腹腔镜和开腹阑尾切除术后的腹腔内脓肿
J Gastrointest Surg. 1997 Mar-Apr;1(2):188-92; discussion 192-3. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(97)80108-4.
5
Hospital charges for Nissen fundoplication and other laparoscopic procedures.
Surg Endosc. 1996 Mar;10(3):359-60. doi: 10.1007/BF00187394.
6
Intraabdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies.腹腔镜和开放性阑尾切除术后的腹腔内脓肿
Surg Endosc. 1996 Mar;10(3):327-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00187382.
7
The integration of laparoscopy into a surgical residency and implications for the training environment.腹腔镜检查纳入外科住院医师培训及其对培训环境的影响。
Surg Endosc. 1994 Sep;8(9):1054-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00705718.
8
A contemporaneous comparison of hospital charges for laparoscopic aand open Nissen fundoplication.
Surg Endosc. 1995 Feb;9(2):156-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00191957.