Canty T G, Collins D, Losasso B, Lynch F, Brown C
Children's Hospital San Diego, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Nov;35(11):1582-5. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.18319.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Whether laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is superior to open appendectomy (OA) for simple (SA) and perforated appendicitis (PA) in children is debatable. The operative experience of 4 senior pediatric surgeons at a single institution was studied over a 6-year period during a transition from OA in all cases to LA in all cases, to answer this question.
All appendectomies from December 1993 to December 1999 were reviewed for operative technique (OA, LA), presence of perforation (SA, PA), operating time (OT), length of stay (LOS), morbidity, and mortality.
There were 1,128 appendectomies in children aged 14 months to 19 years, including 955 LA (653 in SA, 302 in PA) and 173 OA (86 in SA, 87 in PA). OT was equal for LA and OA in SA (52 minutes), but has dropped to less than 40 minutes for LA in the past year. OT in PA was slightly longer in LA versus OA (68 v. 58 minutes; P < .001) but recently has dropped in LA to less than 60 minutes. LOS in SA was 2 days for LA and 3 days for OA; in PA, LOS was 7 days in both LA and OA, but has dropped to 5 days for LA recently. Postoperative abscess rates and incidence of bowel obstruction did not differ between LA and OA in either group. There was no mortality.
LA is at least as safe and effective as, if not superior to, OA for both simple and perforated appendicitis. Postoperative pain is less, and recovery is faster, thereby reducing LOS and overall cost. The growing demand for this procedure can be satisfied without increase in cost, morbidity, or mortality. Laparoscopic appendectomy is our procedure of choice in children.
背景/目的:对于儿童单纯性阑尾炎(SA)和穿孔性阑尾炎(PA),腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)是否优于开腹阑尾切除术(OA)存在争议。在一家机构从所有病例均采用OA过渡到所有病例均采用LA的6年期间,研究了4位资深儿科外科医生的手术经验,以回答这个问题。
回顾了1993年12月至1999年12月期间所有阑尾切除术的手术技术(OA、LA)、穿孔情况(SA、PA)、手术时间(OT)、住院时间(LOS)、发病率和死亡率。
共有1128例14个月至19岁儿童接受了阑尾切除术,其中955例为LA(SA 653例,PA 302例),173例为OA(SA 86例,PA 87例)。SA中LA和OA的OT相等(52分钟),但在过去一年中LA的OT已降至不到40分钟。PA中LA的OT比OA略长(68对58分钟;P <.001),但最近LA的OT已降至不到60分钟。SA中LA的LOS为2天,OA为3天;PA中LA和OA的LOS均为7天,但最近LA已降至5天。两组中LA和OA的术后脓肿发生率和肠梗阻发生率无差异。无死亡病例。
对于单纯性和穿孔性阑尾炎,LA至少与OA一样安全有效,甚至可能更优。术后疼痛较轻,恢复较快,从而缩短了LOS并降低了总体成本。在不增加成本、发病率或死亡率的情况下,可以满足对该手术日益增长的需求。腹腔镜阑尾切除术是我们在儿童中首选的手术方式。