Greenwald D J, Reznikoff M, Plutchik R
Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, New York.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994 Jan;182(1):3-8. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199401000-00002.
The purposes of the study were: a) to examine whether risk for suicide and risk for violence were positively or negatively correlated; and b) to investigate potential predictors/mediators of suicide risk alone, violence risk alone, and risk for both suicide and violence. Suicide risk and violence risk were considered outcome variables. The predictor/mediator variables were eight ego defense mechanisms and 13 dysfunctional personality styles (both have been linked to aggressive risk). Seventy-four male alcoholics were administered questionnaire measures of suicide risk and violence risk, defenses, and disordered personality functioning. Results indicated that suicide and violence risk were significantly positively correlated. Three sets of predictor/mediator variables were identified: those predicting violence risk alone, those predicting suicide risk alone, and those predicting combined aggressive risk (risk for both suicide and violence). Connections obtained between predictor/mediator variables and outcome variables were explained in the context of existent clinical theory.
a)检验自杀风险与暴力风险是正相关还是负相关;b)单独调查自杀风险、暴力风险以及自杀和暴力风险的潜在预测因素/中介因素。自杀风险和暴力风险被视为结果变量。预测因素/中介因素变量包括八种自我防御机制和13种功能失调的人格类型(两者均与攻击风险相关)。对74名男性酗酒者进行了自杀风险、暴力风险、防御机制和人格功能紊乱的问卷调查。结果表明,自杀风险与暴力风险显著正相关。确定了三组预测因素/中介因素变量:单独预测暴力风险的变量、单独预测自杀风险的变量以及预测综合攻击风险(自杀和暴力风险)的变量。在现有临床理论的背景下解释了预测因素/中介因素变量与结果变量之间的联系。