Juniper E F, Guyatt G H, Willan A, Griffith L E
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Jan;47(1):81-7. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90036-1.
This study was carried out to determine whether the minimal important difference, in evaluative quality of life instruments which use a 7-point scale, is similar across individual domains and for both improvement and deterioration. Thirty nine adults with asthma were studied, using an 8 week cohort with assessments at 0, 4 and 8 weeks. The outcomes were the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire and global rating of change. For overall asthma-specific quality of life and for all individual domains (activities, emotions, symptoms), the minimal important difference of quality of life score per item was very close to 0.5 (range: 0.42-0.58); differences of approximately 1.0 represented a moderate change (range: 0.77-1.51); differences greater than 1.5 represented large changes. Changes for improvement and deterioration were very similar. The changes in quality of life score that represent a minimal important difference are very similar to those observed for other evaluative instruments. The observation that the minimal important difference is consistent across domains and for both improvement and deterioration will facilitate interpretation of results of studies examining quality of life.
本研究旨在确定使用7分制的生活质量评估工具中,最小重要差异在各个领域以及改善和恶化情况下是否相似。对39名成年哮喘患者进行了研究,采用为期8周的队列研究,在第0、4和8周进行评估。结果指标为哮喘生活质量问卷和总体变化评分。对于总体哮喘特异性生活质量以及所有个体领域(活动、情绪、症状),每项生活质量评分的最小重要差异非常接近0.5(范围:0.42 - 0.58);约1.0的差异代表中度变化(范围:0.77 - 1.51);大于1.5的差异代表较大变化。改善和恶化的变化非常相似。代表最小重要差异的生活质量评分变化与其他评估工具观察到的变化非常相似。最小重要差异在各领域以及改善和恶化情况下均一致这一观察结果,将有助于解释生活质量研究的结果。