Archibald Y M, Lunn D, Ruttan L A, Macdonald D R, Del Maestro R F, Barr H W, Pexman J H, Fisher B J, Gaspar L E, Cairncross J G
Department of Psychology, Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Neurosurg. 1994 Feb;80(2):247-53. doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.80.2.0247.
In a pilot study, two groups of patients with malignant glioma underwent sequential neuropsychological evaluations after successful tumor treatment. Group 1 included nine patients treated from 1981 to 1985; all patients received irradiation and eight underwent chemotherapy. The baseline neuropsychological assessment was performed 1 to 63 months after tumor diagnosis, with follow-up evaluations at irregular intervals over the next 3 to 7 years. Six patients in Group 1 exhibited impairment on most measures at baseline; subsequently, two patients developed profound cognitive impairment. Initially, three patients functioned in the average range on most tasks; thereafter, two deteriorated on one measure each. Group 2 was ascertained prospectively and included 16 patients treated from 1985 to 1987, all of whom received irradiation and chemotherapy. The first evaluation was performed 18 months after diagnosis, then every 6 months for 2 years, and then yearly. Compared to a control group, those in Group 2 had significant cognitive impairment at baseline. Cognitive performance did not change over the next 12 months in 10 patients who remained free of tumor, but within 2 years of baseline testing, deterioration on specific tasks was evident in two of seven disease-free survivors. When last tested, five of six disease-free survivors had deteriorated on one or more measures. Unlike Group 1, severe global cognitive impairment was not seen, perhaps because Group 2 was followed for a shorter time. Verbal and nonverbal composite scores derived from intelligence quotient (IQ) tests showed less impairment at baseline than did other measures and were more likely to remain stable subsequently. Verbal memory and sustained attention were the most impaired at baseline, and verbal learning and flexibility in thinking showed the greatest tendency to decline over time. Cognitive functioning in survivors of high-grade glioma is best measured and monitored by tests that probe a broader spectrum of abilities than IQ. Neuropsychological measures used in this analysis lacked sensitivity at the lower end of the impaired range. Future studies should use tests better able to discern cognitive differences at low performance levels. Based on this experience, the authors conclude that most long-term survivors of high-grade glioma will have significant cognitive difficulties, usually evident by the first assessment; some patients will develop profound impairment years later, and few are capable of fully independent living.
在一项初步研究中,两组恶性胶质瘤患者在肿瘤治疗成功后接受了连续的神经心理学评估。第一组包括1981年至1985年接受治疗的9名患者;所有患者均接受了放疗,8名患者接受了化疗。基线神经心理学评估在肿瘤诊断后1至63个月进行,随后在接下来的3至7年进行不定期随访评估。第一组中的6名患者在基线时的大多数测量指标上都表现出损伤;随后,2名患者出现了严重的认知障碍。最初,3名患者在大多数任务上的功能处于平均水平;此后,2名患者在一项测量指标上出现了恶化。第二组是前瞻性确定的,包括1985年至1987年接受治疗的16名患者,他们均接受了放疗和化疗。第一次评估在诊断后18个月进行,然后在2年中每6个月进行一次,之后每年进行一次。与对照组相比,第二组患者在基线时存在明显的认知障碍。在接下来的12个月里,10名未复发肿瘤的患者的认知表现没有变化,但在基线测试后的2年内,7名无病幸存者中的2名在特定任务上出现了恶化。在最后一次测试时,6名无病幸存者中有5名在一项或多项测量指标上出现了恶化。与第一组不同,未观察到严重的全面认知障碍,这可能是因为对第二组的随访时间较短。从智商(IQ)测试得出的语言和非语言综合分数在基线时的损伤程度低于其他测量指标,并且随后更有可能保持稳定。语言记忆和持续注意力在基线时受损最严重,语言学习和思维灵活性随时间下降的趋势最大。对于高级别胶质瘤幸存者的认知功能,最好通过比智商测试更广泛地探测能力的测试来进行测量和监测。本分析中使用的神经心理学测量指标在受损范围的下限缺乏敏感性。未来的研究应该使用能够更好地辨别低表现水平认知差异的测试。基于这一经验,作者得出结论,大多数高级别胶质瘤的长期幸存者会有明显的认知困难,通常在首次评估时就很明显;一些患者在数年之后会出现严重损伤,很少有患者能够完全独立生活。